Keeping In Touch with politics and other issues in Central Virginia .....The Virginia 22nd Senate District and The 6th Congressional District......Vote Democratic for a Better Future....Protect Your Benefits

Democratic Committee Meeting

Thursday, October 8, 2009

No Code of Ethics Says Supervisors


Supervisors Vote NO on Ethics


Dist 1. Donald Kidd
Dist 2. Vernon Wood
Dist 3. Chris Adams
Dist 4. S. Ray Vandall
Dist 5. Leon Parrish (Chairman)

Amherst County Virginia Democratic News

After months of debate, the Amherst County Board of Supervisors unanimously voted against adopting an ethics code at a work session Monday.


Since April the board has reviewed the four-page policy document as a possible guideline of conduct for local government officials.

On Monday, supervisors reiterated their concerns regarding the code’s language and purpose.


“I don’t see this document is going to cause us to adhere to anything we don’t already adhere to,” said Vice Chairman Chris Adams.


Several supervisors took specific issue with a portion of the code that requires board members contact staff only through the county administrator or a department head.

Supervisor Ray Vandall said he thought the focus of the ethics code was too wide and that parts of it centered on operational rather than ethical matters. “It goes a lot farther than I ever anticipated,” he said. “I thought this was a matter for the Board of Supervisors, not every part of the county.”


Also at the work session Monday, the board voted to cease looking into a possible leak of confidential information in the police investigation of a former county employee.

Previously the board asked the Attorney General of Virginia to investigate the matter, but the office declined, stating that it would not “cannot supersede or interfere with investigations into local matters.”


The board had authorized a probe in June, following the resignation of former county administrator Rodney Taylor. Taylor said the board asked him to resign in April after he accused a supervisor of leaking confidential information to a private attorney.


Amherst’s commonwealth attorney Stephanie Maddox, who was present at the workshop session, said that the potential leak had no effect on the prosecution’s case of the former county employee.


Adams said that, in light of the remaining options, he did not see the need to continue with an investigation. “We need to put this behind us. I think that will do us, as well as the county citizens, justice in the end.”


Supervisor Don Kidd agreed, saying he did not want to spend taxpayers’ money on a private investigation.


The board also discussed the potential impact the reduced level of state aid will have on the county’s 2010 budget.


The amount in reductions already totals $405,223, with a large bulk of those reductions affecting the commonwealth attorney’s office, the clerk’s office and the sheriff’s expense fund.


Adams stressed the importance of the county government working together to absorb the deficit in the county’s budget so that one department alone would not have to shoulder the burden. The reductions affect the entire county and should be dealt with “systemically,” he said.


At Monday’s work session, the board scheduled a public hearing for Oct. 20 to discuss whether the county should take on responsibility for the Amherst train station-visitors center project, undertaken for the last 10 years by the Friends of the Historic Train Station.

ACVDN











Deeds Points Finger at Washington


Deeds Blames Washington


Virginia Democratic gubernatorial nominee Creigh Deeds said in an interview that he was lagging in the polls entering the final weeks of the campaign in part because of voter concerns over his national party’s agenda.

“Frankly, a lot of what’s going on in Washington has made it very tough,” Deeds said in a “Battleground Virginia” interview sponsored by ABC 7/WJLA-TV, POLITICO, Google and YouTube. “We had a very tough August because people were just uncomfortable with the spending; they were uncomfortable with a lot of what was going on, a lot of the noise that was coming out of Washington, D.C.”


As one of two off-year governor’s races — the other is New Jersey — that are being closely watched for signals about the 2010 midterm election landscape, the factors behind Deeds’s struggles to date are being studied closely in both parties.


If the ambitious agenda being pushed by President Barack Obama is what’s dragging down the Deeds campaign — rather than the candidate’s own deficiencies, as some top Democrats believe — then the Virginia race could be a troubling harbinger for the national party.


In Virginia, this year’s contest will test how deeply a new politics has taken root in the Old Dominion. Democrats have won the governor’s race in this traditionally conservative-tilting state twice in a row, and Obama last year became the first Democrat in 44 years to carry the commonwealth in a presidential election.


But while the race seems to have tightened in recent weeks, Republican Bob McDonnell has never trailed in any poll — despite a drumbeat of hard-hitting Deeds ads portraying him as a conservative extremist hostile to working women.


Both Deeds, a state senator, and McDonnell, a former state attorney general, discussed the race with WJLA anchor Leon Harris and POLITICO Editor-in-Chief John F. Harris in separate interviews that were broadcast Tuesday night on the ABC affiliate in Washington. The candidates also took questions from Virginians ranging from a Leesburg City Council member to a George Mason University student, via Google Moderator and YouTube.

Deeds said he was now “reframing” the race in an effort to shift the focus more toward state issues and away from a broader national debate that is perilous for a Democrat running in a slightly right-of-center state.


But even while confidently laying out a path to victory, Deeds conceded that McDonnell had staked out a lead over the summer, thanks to the absence of a GOP primary and the Republican’s ability to spend much of the year introducing himself to voters in a fashion that downplayed his roots as a social conservative.


“I came out of the primary, and a lot of people didn’t expect me to win,” he said. “I had to spend a couple of months hunkering down, raising money. Bob could build up his fundraising advantage to run soft and fuzzy ads and build up a lead over me.”


Deeds defeated two other Democrats in a costly June primary that depleted his war chest. He has trailed McDonnell in every poll since then, but public and private surveys have indicated the race has tightened.


That’s in part because of the disclosure of a controversial graduate school thesis McDonnell penned in 1989, when the then-34-year-old Republican outlined a series of far-right stances on cultural issues, including a claim that working women were a detriment to society.


The document, Deeds said, puts McDonnell’s record “in context.” The Democrat has saturated the airwaves with ads informing voters about his rival’s writings.

Before he narrowly defeated Deeds in 2005 to become attorney general, McDonnell served for 14 years as a state delegate, carving out a reputation in the General Assembly as a go-to man for cultural conservatives.


The Republican denied, however, that he had been animated by issues such as abortion in his years in the Legislature.

“Two percent of the bills that I patroned in the General Assembly had to do with abortion — eight out of 386. And guess what? Five of them were the same,” McDonnell said, noting that some of the measures included widely supported efforts to outlaw some late-term abortions and require minors to gain parental consent for abortions.


He suggested that voters, in a state that has been rapidly trending toward the Democrats and has a political tradition of rewarding moderation, are aware of his social conservatism.


“People know that I’m pro-life, I’m pro-family, and that shouldn’t be a surprise to anybody,” McDonnell said, while adding that it’s kitchen-table issues such as jobs and roads that he’s been running on in this campaign.


That focus — and his own polished presentation — have played a significant role in the GOP’s advantage to date in the contest, something Deeds himself hinted at.

“If this election is about who’s the smoothest candidate, who can be the slickest communicator, I’m not going to win,” Deeds said.


To this end, the Democrat acknowledged that he had not performed well following a Fairfax, Va., debate last month — when, in a conversation with reporters, he equivocated on whether he’d raise taxes for transportation.


The moment was captured on camera, and now national Republicans are spending millions to air the footage in a commercial pummeling Deeds.


“I’ve been in the Legislature 18 years, and it’s easy for me to lapse into legislative-speak,” he said.


Deeds reiterated that he’d be willing to sign a tax increase for transportation if that is what a bipartisan commission recommended.


Even while McDonnell has benefited from outrage on the right and unease in the middle toward President Barack Obama — and a hunger among many in his party to reclaim the governor’s mansion after successive Democratic chief executives — he expressed a measure of concern about the volume of the political debate.


“There are people on both sides of the political spectrum that feel very deeply about their views and probably routinely cross the line,” McDonnell said, noting that he found some behavior at the town halls and the outburst toward Obama by Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.) “inappropriate.”


As for his own party, Deeds said he and Obama agreed on a majority of issues and that he expected the president to come into Virginia to campaign with him before next month’s election.

“I don’t think he’s getting enough credit right now for lots of good signs that are emerging in the economy,” Deeds said, while noting that he differs with the president on cap and trade.


And despite his deficit in the polls, Deeds indicated that he wasn’t interested in any further debates.

Asked about a statement he made earlier this year in an interview with WJLA and POLITICO, in which he said he would like to face his Republican rival in a debate, Deeds faulted his campaign.


“I don’t have anything to do with the schedule,” he said. “I would have loved to have done a debate with this format.”


When it was noted that it was his name on the ballot, Deeds said that his campaign had a multitude of requests and pointed out that he and McDonnell had done more forums this year than the two candidates in the 2005 gubernatorial race.


Johnson Sorry for Mocking Deeds


Shelia Johnson, I'm Sorry


BET founder Sheila Johnson, a top Bob McDonnell campaign surrogate in the Virginia governor's race, apologized on Monday for making fun of Democratic rival Creigh Deeds’s stutter at a recent rally.


“Two weeks ago I made reference to Creigh Deeds’s inability to clearly communicate effective solutions to the serious problems facing Virginia,” Johnson said in a statement e-mailed to POLITICO. “I shouldn’t have done it in the manner in which I did and for that I apologize for any offense he, or others, may have taken.”


Johnson’s comments were captured on video by a tracker from the Deeds campaign, which then distributed the video through a number of left-leaning state and national blogs. Once it video went viral, the video quickly became cable fodder for hosts questioning if the governor’s race had seen its own “macaca” moment, referring to the derogatory epitheth that torpedoed the 2006 re-election campaign of Sen. George Allen (R-Va.).

The video got prime placement on the Huffington Post and other leading liberal blogs and was the focus of one of the opening segments of MSNBC’s “Hardball.”



Johnson is seen on the video trying to distinguish the differences between Deeds, a Democratic state senator, and McDonnell, the former state attorney general who is the Republican gubernatorial candidate.


“We need someone who can really communicate,” Johnson says on the video. “Bob McDonnell can communicate. The other people that I talk to, especially his o-o-o-opponent could not articulate what needed to be done.”


After spreading the video, Deeds’ campaign seized on the remarks, arguing in a conference call with reporters that Johnson’s comment was “offensive to many people.”

“Our comment on this is pretty simple. It’s disappointing. It’s disappointing when one campaign resorts to these petty personal attacks,” said Deeds adviser Mo Elleithee. “If you’re looking for someone who is polished, Creigh is probably not the first person to come to mind…whether or not Creigh has a speaking issue is less important than their blanket indictment about people who have speech impediments.”



McDonnell communications director Tucker Martin shot back that Deeds “has never had a problem voicing his false attacks about Bob McDonnell.”


“What he has had difficulty expressing is any positive vision for Virginia’s future. Democratic businesswoman Sheila Johnson was noting that fact,” Martin said. “Why the Deeds campaign wants to attack a prominent supporter of both Governor Tim Kaine and President Barack Obama, while reminding voters that she strongly supports Bob McDonnell for governor, is beyond us.”




Blog Archive