Keeping In Touch with politics and other issues in Central Virginia .....The Virginia 22nd Senate District and The 6th Congressional District......Vote Democratic for a Better Future....Protect Your Benefits

Democratic Committee Meeting

Saturday, May 12, 2012

Republicans Garrett and Cline say NO MONEY FOR EDUCATION

Tom Garrett and Ben Cline are AWOL on Educational Funding for Amherst County students as Republicans turn away in this time of  Crisis.
Tom Garrett, The Missing Man, Generally seen around election time begging for votes.

Gov Bob McDonnell has just one idea and that is to borrow money from the woefully underfunded Virginia Retirement System that supplies the state’s teachers among other public employees with retirement.      Gov Bob wants to be Vice President on a Mitt Romney ticket and desperately wants to say he didn't raise taxes, not even by a thin dime.     McDonnell is a phoney playing with smoke and mirrors while letting our state suffer from his incompentence and neglect as our next generation is shorted on a good education.

If the Republicans and Gov Bob spent as much time on educating our kids and providing funding for the school system as they do trying to take complete control of a woman's body and denying her health care and attempting to control her every action we would not have a shortage of funds for public education.    Gov Bob would be happier too and would have the nickname  " Bob Vaginal Probe McDonnell".    If Romney does choose Bob to run for VP the first thought to cross everyone's mind will be his nickname and not vice president.

The governor and the General Assembly  “borrowed”  money from the VRS in 2010 to balance the final state budget.     That was done in lieu of raising state taxes to balance the budget.   Bob and the republicans have hit rock bottom as there is no one else to borrow from so now they dump the problem on the localities.    I hope borrow is the correct term and that the retirement fund gets a return of its funds.   When you deal with  republicans you never really know.

So where is the governor going to get the $2.2 billion to pay back the VRS?    He is proposing that the localities ask the teachers to increase their share of their retirement pay or that the localities themselves absorb their share of the additional retirement costs.   Neither of those two proposals actually pays the retirement fund back.   Gov Bob is blowing smoke and if you're dumb enough he'll blow it up one of your orifices.   What position do Tom Garrett and Ben Cline take in reguards to this issue?    If you see either one
of them be sure to ask.

Ben Cline votes the way the Leader tells him to.    He could save time and phone his vote in.

What McDonnell will do is kick the can down the road and leave the problem to be handled by the next in line.   Tom Garrett and Ben Cline are foot servants for the Tea Party will play along and let the problem fester until a Democrat is elected Gov. and then they will moan and complain about the situation daily even though they created the problem.    Republicans refuse to work with Democrats to solve problems and the back country areas of the state continue to be held in a death grip by the Republican party.   Later when the Republicans blame this problem on the Democrats please be smart enough to remember who did what to who.     To those of you
partisans who would rather have republicans lying to you than good government all I can say is Wise Up and stop playing the GOP dummy.

Instead of being able to call on Senator Bert Dodson who is an experienced local man who cares deeply about educating the next generation and has plentiful experience working with the state on local budget issues the voters threw their support to the Tea Party and elected a man you won't see again until he needs your vote for
reelection.    You got just what you voted for NOTHING.     No Help.    It is the same with Ben Cline who could mail his vote to Richmond since the GOP Leaders instruct him how to vote and he complies.

So now you find yourself cutting 19 positions in Amherst County Schools and closure of the Monroe Education Center.   You have devalued the future of all the children in Amherst County who go to public school and you have done it by supporting a political party that refuses to do the things that make our system function.    You must be elephant proud of yourself.

School Board Chairman Jones H. Stanley could have been speaking to the governor or the legislature when he said,    “I hope that someone … sees what kind of trouble we’re in.”    Chairman Stanley needs to come to grips with the cold hard Republican Tea Party facts, Republicans could not care less about spending money on education for our kids.   Their main function in life is defunding social programs and shifting money to bigger and bigger tax breaks for business.     One of the board members actually said “Education begins at home and ends at home,”    (Frank Campbell said, echoing what Pugh said at the previous supervisors’ meeting).

Perhaps Campbell and Pugh could explain exactly what they mean.   Are they refering to home schooling?   Are they taking the Tea Party line and endorsing ending public education?    Are they taking us back to a much earlier time when education had much less value than it does today?    What does  “Education begins at home and
ends at home,”  mean?     Sensible people realize that givernment requires enough income to fund the needs of the people.   If there were no schools, no roads and bridges to maintain, no police departments and no social services then taxes could be lower and this seems to be the republican tea party dream.    It is just a dream,
Wake Up and reach the accomodations needed for our government to function on behalf of its citizens.

Possible cuts to be considered include field trips; activity buses; support staff such as custodians, instructional assistants and secretaries; professional staffers such as administrators; extracurricular activities; and additional elementary, middle and high school teachers.

“It’s going to affect every student in some way,” Ratliff said. “We’re getting ready to lose a lot of unbelievable people.   These are essential positions.”    You folks should be working with Senator Garrett and Delegate Cline to solve these problems.   They claim to represent the people of Amherst County.   Ask them to do their job.

Non-personnel cuts included reduction of money for athletic travel and events,  elimination of stipends for indoor track and an assistant football coach;  field trip money;  a visual and performing arts program;  and a school resource officer position filled by the Amherst County Sheriff’s Office, for a savings of $183,565.

If personnel cuts had been used exclusively to alleviate the deficit, eight more positions would be eliminated, including an elementary-level assistant principal and two school counselors.

Where will Amherst County get that additional money?    Unless it decides to cut teacher salaries or to cut programs that have already been cut to the bone, the county will have to raise taxes or find some other new revenues.    That’s something Del. Ben Cline, R-Rockbridge, who represents most of Amherst in the House of Delegates and freshman state Sen. Tom Garrett, R-Louisa, who represents the county in the Senate, will have to think about.   Actually they will have to do more than think about it, they need to deliver help for Amherst County.   If we had representatives in the Delegate and Senate positions help would already be on the way.

When will the people of Amherst County realize that Republicans are their good time friends?   How many times have the republicans disappeared when you needed them?   Looked the other way when you needed help?   The public school system is one of the most important functions of society.   It prepares our children to meet the
challenges of the future and to get a job, earn a living and contribute to the tax base so the next generation can be educated.   When you break that chain you kiss the future goodby.   Your fixation with voting Republican is wiping out the future for the young people in Amherst County.   Republicans don't believe in government and
they are only  too happy to tell you  that they want to  defund everything.   Why vote for a party that openly tells you their goal is to kill government?

Bob  "VP"  McDonnell

Are they comfortable opposing state tax increases knowing at the same time that the localities will have to raise taxes to maintain the same level of services they currently have?    Republicans could not care less about anything but creating a bigger tax break for big business and the rich.  

Mittens the Bully and Bob VP McDonnell
Dreams of Tommorow

And while the governor’s budget has proposed additional money for K-12 public education, Ratliff said most  “of the money will go to funding the VRS.”    It may look like there is more money for K-12, but that is not accurate, he said.   McDonnell needs to put the money back in  VRS  he took out  to balance  a budget.   Once again
Republicans are spending the resources that working people put away for their future so they can maintain that they didn't raise taxes.   Robbing funds from someones retirement is worse than a tax increase because the owner of that retirement will be older and less able to deal with the problem when they retire.   It is time for these Tea Party Republicans to act like grown mature men and solve these problems.

Other school systems in Central Virginia are undoubtedly looking at the same problem.   Larger systems, such as Lynchburg and Bedford, could be looking at far greater deficits than the one facing Amherst.    Sadly Lynchburg is saddled with Tom Garrett as their state Senator just like Amherst County and Appomattox County.   They will hear from Tom when he once again needs a vote at re-election time.    Even the Tea Party must be beginning to feel shorted by the Republican they supported.   Maby Not, the tea party is only loosely connected to reality.
It’s a continuing example of the state refusing to raise taxes to meet needs and passing those   needs on to the localities.     It is a continuing case of the Republicans raiding somebodies pension funds to meet needs and passing the problem on down the line for the next office holder to solve.    It’s a shameful course of events
for a service as important as public education.   Republicans are still pulling the wool over the voters eyes.

Senator Garrett and Delegate Cline need to address and solve these problems.   If the other members of your party refuse to help then stand against them and represent the people you asked to put you in office.   Holding the political positions you got elected to is not a ticket for a free ride and we are calling on you to solve these
problems.   Do your job or turn in your letter and step down so we can find someone who will do the job.


Local News . . . .

Amherst Virginia Headlines

Lynchburg Headlines

Appomattox Headlines



Romney Addreses Gay Marriage Issue at Liberty University
Mitt doesn't know himself what positions he will take on any given day.

Mitt Romney delivered a commencement speech Saturday at Liberty University in which he focused largely on a message of faith, family, voting republican, hard work and avoiding military service, but he also addressed the emerging same-sex marriage issue by saying  "marriage is a relationship between one man and one woman and one more woman and later some younger women."   Mitt said that the most important thing was that it would be a "some sex marrige".

Liberty teaches its students that the Morman religon is a cult and not a christian religon but all the rules and teachings go out the window when it comes to right wing republican politics.   Other things go out the window also but those decisions are made on a case by case basis which is the evangelical way.   The Morman religon teaches that Baptist won't get to ride the space ship to the blessed planet but Mitt put that aside as he chased votes.   I guess both of these outfits have a lot of flexibility when dealing for themselves.   They only toe the line when judging others.


Rick said Mitt was the worst possible candidate and he really told the truth

Mitts remarks, jokes and stories drew loud applause for the likely GOP presidential candidate who faces a big test in trying to win over tepid evangelical voters.   With Rick Santorum's warm and deeply felt endorsement the job should be easier, especially since Newt Gingrich got on board and voiced his love and support so strongly.  


Newt said Mittons is what he is, we aren't running a real conservative you know.    He's the closest thing to a Republican we have in this race.

Mitt said his whole life changed after he met his wife Ann in that he got out of the gang he was leading and stopped beating up and bullying long haired kids who he could not remember.   The Liberty students would never have to fear a beating from Mitt as their rules require that their hair not extend down their necks or over their ears or be long enough to get in their eyes.   Pony tails are completely out and a big No-No.   It is good to have lots of rules for these young students to live by.   Who could guess what they would do if they encountered freedom and the real world and made decisions for themselves.  

Romney delivered his speech at the largest Christian college in the world and the heart of conservative Virginia.   It followed President Obama’s recent announcement that he personally supports gay marriage.   Liberty had planned to sacrifice a gay but word of their intended action got leaked to the media and gays near the school became as rare as virgins.   Don't we all miss a good virgin sacrifice to the gods?

In the keynote speech at the Lynchburg, Va., school, founded by Baptist and TV evangelist and showman Jerry Falwell, Romney appealed to the graduating class -- along with their families and others -- largely by sticking to the argument that he is the best candidate to improve the economy.

“For you and so many young Americans, our current troubles can be discouraging,” said Romney, the former Massachusetts governor.   “Millions wait on the day when there are jobs for everyone willing to work, and opportunities to match your hopes and your goals.   You waited thru 8 years of GW Bush so don't lose heart, because that day is coming.”    Stephen Colbert is championing this issue and assures you he is building a better tommorow, tommorow.



All across America a Christian Mob is forming and with a feeding frenzy that sharks would be proud of they are attacking President Obama for expressing the opinion that he would support gay citizens rights to marry.   For some strange reason the Christians think they own marriage and that is one really silly and uninformed thought.

Marriage can be recognized by a state, an organization, a religious authority, a tribal group, a local community or peers. It is often viewed as a contract. Civil marriage is the legal concept of marriage as a governmental institution irrespective of religious affiliation, in accordance with marriage laws of the jurisdiction.


This couple used to get the Christian Ministers fired up to deliver a good sermon

Marriage (also called matrimony or wedlock) is a social union or legal contract between people that creates kinship.    The definition of marriage varies according to different cultures, but is usually an institution in which interpersonal relationships, usually intimate and sexual, are acknowledged.     Such a union is often formalized via a wedding ceremony.     Many cultures limit marriage to two persons of the opposite sex, but some allow forms of polygamous marriage, and some recognize same-sex marriage.      In some cultures, marriage is recommended or compulsory before pursuing any sexual activity.

From the early Christian era (30 to 325 CE), marriage was thought of as primarily a private matter, with no uniform religious or other ceremony being required.    However, bishop Ignatius of Antioch writing around 110 to bishop Polycarp of Smyrna exhorts,    "It becomes both men and women who marry, to form their union with the approval of the bishop, that their marriage may be according to God, and not after their own lust."


Wedded Bliss

In the 12th century women were obligated to take the name of their husbands and starting in the second half of the 16th century parental consent along with the church's consent was required for marriage.   During the Middle Ages marriages were arranged, sometimes as early as birth, and these early pledges to marry were often used to ensure treaties between different royal families, nobles, and heirs of fiefdoms.     In some jurisdictions, such as Brazil, New Zealand, Uruguay, France and the U.S. states of Hawaii and Illinois, civil unions are also open to opposite-sex couples.

Marriage, as we know it in our Western civilization today, has a long history with roots in several very different ancient cultures, of which the Roman, Hebrew, and Germanic are the most important. Western marriage has further been shaped by the doctrines and policies of the medieval Christian church, the demands of the Protestant Reformation, and the social impact of the Industrial Revolution.

Same Sex Couples

When we look at the marriage customs of our ancestors, we discover several striking facts.    For example, for the most of Western history, marriage was not a mere personal matter concerning only husband and wife, but rather the business of their two families which brought them together.     Most marriages, therefore, were arranged.

Moreover, the wife usually had much fewer rights than her husband and was expected to be subservient to him.      To a considerable extent, marriage was also an economic arrangement.     There was little room for romantic love, and even simple affection was not considered essential.     Procreation and cooperation were the main marital duties.

On the other hand, it may surprise many modern couples to learn that in earlier times divorce was often easily granted.    Here again, men usually had the advantage when they could simply dismiss their wives, but in many instances women could also sue for divorce.     In ancient Rome couples could even divorce each other by mutual agreement, a possibility that has not yet returned to all European countries.    Another notable historical fact is the nearly universal stress on the necessity of marriage and the resulting pressure on single persons to get married.     This pressure was partially lifted only under the influence of Christianity which, at least for some time, found a special virtue in celibacy.     Christian doctrines have, of course, also had their effects on marriage itself, and some of these will be discussed below.




In ancient Greece marriage was seen as a fundamental social institution. Indeed, the great lawgiver Solon once contemplated making marriage compulsory, and in Athens under Pericles bachelors were excluded from certain important public positions. Sparta, while encouraging sexual relationships between men, nevertheless insisted on their marrying and producing children. Single and childless men were treated with scorn.


However, while marriage was deemed important, it was usually treated as a practical matter without much romantic significance.   A father arranged the most advantageous marriage for his son and then had a contract signed before witnesses.     Shortly thereafter a wedding celebration was held and the young couple (who might
never have met before) was escorted to bed.     All marriages were monogamous.    As a rule, the bridegroom was in his thirties and the bride was a teenager.    In addition to this disparity in ages there also existed an inequality in education and political rights.     Women were considered inferior to men and remained confined to the home.
Their main function as wives was to produce children and to manage the household while their husbands tended to public affairs.   For their erotic needs, men often turned to prostitutes and concubines.

As Demosthenes, the orator, explained it:    "We have prostitutes for our pleasure, concubines for our health, and wives to bear us lawful offspring."      Many men also cultivated intense emotional and sexual relationships with male adolescents (paiderastia).    The legal inequality of the sexes was further reflected in the divorce
regulations.     It was always easier for a husband to divorce his wife than vice versa.     However, since a divorced woman could take her dowry back with her, men normally asked for a divorce only in cases of female adultery and infertility.



So when a religous leader speaks of the 5000 year history of marriage as between a man and a woman that leader is misinformed, ignorant or lying.   Possibly all three.

Founded by John Noyes in 1948, the Oneida colony in upstate New York cultivated a form of group marriage called  "complex marriage"  in which theoretically every woman was married to every man.     The community also practiced  "scientific breeding" in which potential parents were matched by committee for physical and mental health.

The members of the Mormon church were relentlessly persecuted, harassed, and ridiculed because of their polygamy.     Finally, they were forced to abandon the practice but other renegade groups in the US still practice polygamy and there is even a reality TV show starring one man and his several wives. 

Until well into the 19th century marriage was still basically an economic arrangement.    Moreover, the husband was usually the one who profited most, because he was the  "head of the household" and controlled his wife's property.     He also had many other rights denied to his wife and was favored by a moral double standard that
allowed him considerable sexual license.   Under the circumstances, women continued to press for further reforms, a process which even today has not yet fully reached its goal.   Who would have thought?   Women want control of their own bodies,  Republicans object to such foolishness.

Local News . . . .


Monroe Virginia






Madison Heights
Nelson County
Campbell County


Tim Kaine for Senate
Amherst Virginia Democratic News
Sen. Mark Warner likes to tell a joke when he’s on the trail with Tim Kaine, and lately he’s been telling it a lot.

The Virginia Democrat crisscrossed the state with his fellow former governor last week for a two-day, nine-stop tour.     They ended the trek at a rally in this historic college town on Thursday, exactly one year after Kaine entered the race for the seat of retiring Sen. Jim Webb (D).

“So it is with great affection that I turn over the mike to my friend of 32 years ... and, with your help, the future junior Senator from Virginia, Tim Kaine,”  Warner said, with an emphasis on  “junior,” to a crowd of nearly 400 just before the sun set on the downtown pedestrian mall.

The remark invited a roar of laughter at the rally, as it did an hour earlier with a small gathering of community members at a nearby state workforce center, which both Democrats helped launch as governors in the past decade.


ACVDN

Warner is three years older than Kaine, preceded him as governor and now is working to help his fellow Harvard Law School graduate join him in the Senate. Warner will surely have a similarly strong presence on the trail in the waning weeks of Kaine’s expected general election matchup with George Allen (R), a former Senator and governor.

As well-known as both Kaine and Allen are, both are also counting on the help of the two most popular politicians in the state.     Allen will soon have a strong surrogate of his own on the trail in Gov. Bob McDonnell (R), a possible vice presidential contender.    Like Warner and Kaine, the two Republicans are old friends, and
McDonnell is expected to help Allen as much as possible.

Warner’s effect on Kaine is twofold.     He’s highly popular across the state, scoring a 62 percent job approval rating in a Quinnipiac University poll last month, including 48 percent among Republicans and 66 percent among voters in the western part of the state, where Democrats have not performed well in recent years.

The first-term Senator also serves as a model for the kind of Senator that Kaine will be.     Warner voted with his party an average of 91 percent of the time over three years in the Senate, according to CQ’s vote studies, but he’s also a member of the bipartisan  “gang of six,” and the former businessman is remembered for working with
Republicans as governor in the state Legislature nearly a decade ago to balance the commonwealth’s budget.

“We’ve got to have more people like Mark Warner in the Senate who are willing to be proud Democrats — proud of their values, proud of their principles — but when the election is over you’ve got to be reaching out and building a bridge, and that’s the kind of Senator I’ll be,”   Kaine said at the rally.

Warner was prominently featured in a video the Kaine campaign released Monday with clips from the two-day, economy-focused tour.

Republicans in the state say they don’t mind the comparison.   Chris LaCivita, a GOP strategist and former Allen adviser, said Warner’s votes in favor of the health care overhaul and other Democratic policies are indeed a good example of what voters can expect from Kaine.

“This is a guy who is trying to hide from the fact that he was Barack Obama’s and Nancy Pelosi’s and Harry Reid’s chief cheerleader as the chairman of the Democratic National Committee,”  LaCivita said of Kaine.    “You can run from your past, but we will not let you hide from it.”

Kaine senior adviser Mo Elleithee said Kaine’s time as DNC chairman is only a small part of his record, and the campaign will continue to remind voters of his long record as a Richmond city councilman and mayor, lieutenant governor, and governor.    Voters who spoke with Roll Call following the two Charlottesville events came away impressed and said they trusted the pair to work together with Republicans.

“I do believe they want to get things done,”  said Ron Cottrell, 53, a self-described independent.     “If we change some key players out, maybe we can build some momentum.”

“I think that Kaine and Sen. Warner, they both talk like adults,”  Jeff Boecker, 59, said after the rally.     “And I think we need more people like that up there.      Neither one of them is a flaming partisan to me.     They’re both willing to make the hard choices people need to make.”

Kaine’s not the only candidate in the race highlighting his willingness to work across the aisle.     On April 4, Allen spoke to small gatherings of supporters in Culpeper and Madison, just up Route 29 from Charlottesville, which Allen represented in the House for about a year after winning a 1991 special election.

Allen focused his stump speech on increasing domestic energy production, which he said Kaine has worked against, while supporters at both stops voiced concerns about the effects of Obama’s health care plan and deficit spending.     He promised to be a deciding vote to repeal the health care law, to push for a balanced
budget amendment and to unleash the state’s energy resources, one of the big issues he will focus on in the Senate.

The former Senator, who spoke more about what he will do than what he did in his one term in the Senate, said he sees potential Democratic partners on energy legislation in Sens. Mary Landrieu (La.), Mark Begich (Alaska) and Joe Manchin (W.Va.).     He called his 2006 loss to Webb  “humbling”  and said the party needs to welcome  “independents and sound-thinking Democrats”  in order to win.

“Let’s make sure we are motivating and inspiring people to what I like to say is:    Envision a better future,”  Allen said in Madison. “Envision a better future than what we’re having to endure these days.    And I think we can get folks on our side.”

Allen is no doubt looking forward to the conclusion of the state’s legislative business, when McDonnell will have time to join him on the trail.   The Kaine campaign took advantage of the Congressional recess, allowing Warner to spend two full days with Kaine.

“Voters know that these are two guys that they can trust to work across the aisle, two guys who are always going to put Virginia first, and two guys who are just honest and trustworthy,” Elleithee said. “Clearly they’re both proud Democrats, but they’re never going to put partisanship first. This is a year when that is of great value.”

There is a deficit of excitement generated by these two candidates and it is a toss up as to who will win.     Visit the 
Tim Kaine Website  and try to find the inspiration to vote  for a milk toast Democrat.

Local News . . . . 

Fluvanna County




Louisa County
Prince Edward County
Buckingham County
Cumberland County
Goochland County

Amherst County Virginia Democratic News




If You Don't Vote,  ...  You Don't Matter

Friday, May 11, 2012

Republicans say "Let Those Old People Starve"

House Republicans say  "Let Those Old People Starve"  but Mitt Romney says  "Let Them Eat Cake".
ACV Democratic News

The Meals On Wheels Association of America is the oldest and largest national organization composed of and representing local, community-based Senior Nutrition Programs in all 50 U.S. states, as well as the U.S. Territories.

Amherst County Virginia Democratic News

All told, there are some 5,000 local Senior Nutrition Programs in the United States.    These programs provide well over one million meals to seniors who need them each day.    Some programs serve meals at congregate locations like senior centers, some programs deliver meals directly to the homes of seniors whose mobility is limited, and many programs provide both services.

ACV Democratic News

While remarkable, the one million meals per day figure under-estimates the size and shape of our network and its reach and influence in communities across America.    In addition to the hundreds of thousands of seniors who receive meals, there are many thousands of professionals employed at the various local Senior Nutrition Programs across the U.S.     

ACVDN

More notable than that is the virtual army of volunteers who also  "work"  for these programs.    It is said that this group, numbering between 800,000 and 1.7 million individuals, is the largest volunteer army in the nation.

ACVDN

Now enter Paul Ryan and the House Republicans dead set to defund these services to the elderly.    This is what Republicans stand for and if You are wasting your vote on Republicans then this is what you stand for also.    

ACVDN

"Let Those Old People Starve."   Paul Ryan and the House Republicans

The Republican House voted Thursday to override cuts to the Pentagon’s budget mandated by last summer's debt deal and replace them with spending reductions to food stamps, defunding Meals on Wheels and other mandatory social programs.    In essence the Republicans are reneging on the deal they struck on the debt deal and replacing funding for the Pentagon on the backs of the poor and elderly.

ACVDN

Members approved the Sequester Replacement Reconciliation Act in a party-line 218-199 vote.   As expected, the bill was supported by nearly all Republicans — only 16 opposed it, and no Democrats supported it.

Republicans voting against the bill were Reps. Justin Amash (Mich.),   Roscoe Bartlett (Md.),   Charlie Bass (N.H.),   John Duncan (Tenn.),   Mike Fitzpatrick (Pa.),   Chris Gibson (N.Y.), Louie Gohmert (Texas),   Jaime Herrera Beutler (Wash.),   Tim Johnson (Ill.),   Walter Jones (N.C.),   Raul Labrador (Idaho),   Steve LaTourette (Ohio),   Frank LoBiondo (N.J.),   Todd Platts (Pa.),   Ed Whitfield (Ky.)   and   Frank Wolf (Va.).     GOP Rep. James Sensenbrenner (Wis.)  voted present.

Thank You to the decent Republicans who voted against defunding Meals on Wheels.     16 brave Congressmen floating in a sea of Republican ignorance.     Notice please that Bob Goodlatte voted to let the old people starve.     In case you don't know Goodlatte is the sorry excuse for a human being that pseudo represents the 6th Congressional District which includes Amherst County.
  
Republicans cast the bill as a first step back toward controlling federal spending, after years of allowing spending and deficits to balloon.    All the money saved by the cuts was moved to the Pentagon's budget for military spending thus negating any savings.    
Paul  "Ayn Rand"  Ryan

“We believe the purpose of the sequester was to replace the fact that Congress isn't governing,”  House Budget Committee  Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.)   said during the opening debate on the bill.  “Well, let's have Congress govern.    That's why we're doing this.”    Cutting the social peograms and meals for the elderly fits perfectly in the Ayn Rand philosophy that Paul Ryan is guided by.

Amherst Virginia Democratic News


Luckily Bob Goodlatte has a challenger this time around and we have a chance to change a sorry situation with our vote.     Andy Schmookler is anxious to provide the 6th District of Virginia with the kind of representation required for these tough times.


ACVDN


WHAT ANDY STANDS FOR: 

Government for the People, Not Just the Powerful Few
 • Restoring Integrity to American Democracy
 • Opportunity for All to Fulfill their God-given Potential
 • “One Person, One Vote,” not “One Dollar, One Vote” • Passing on to Our Children a Nation and Planet as Healthy 

    As The One Given Us.
 • Leadership that Brings Out the Best in the American People
 • Seeking and Speaking the Truth
 • Individual Liberty Combined with Wise and Constructive

    Government

Andy Schmookler was born in the spring of 1946 to parents who had grown up in poverty.

AVDN

During the depression, Andy’s mother, Pauline, had to drop out of school at the age of 15 to support her ill mother and her two younger sisters.     Decades later, though she never graduated from high school, she got her college and two masters degrees and became a high school teacher of literature.

His father, Jacob was able to go to college thanks to his own mother’s working 14-hour days at a sewing machine to make it possible.     After World War II, Andy’s father earned his doctorate

in economics and began an academic career.

ACVDN

By the time Andy was 10, his family had a secure footing in the American middle class.

His parents raised him and his brother, Ed.    They taught their sons to have passion for justice, a deep commitment to honesty and integrity, and they instilled the value of hard work.     For Andy’s father, the honest pursuit of the truth was a paramount value.     He taught the discipline of reasoned inquiry.     And for his mother, a key value was that human worth does not lie in rank or wealth, but in beauty of soul, and that gems can be found in every group and at every stratum.


Andy and April            AVDN

Equipped with these values, and with a love of learning: 

•Andy graduated Valedictorian in his high school class in the Twin Cities in Minnesota.
 •He graduated with highest honors in the field of Social Relations from Harvard University.
 •For his graduate studies he attended the University of Chicago in Social Thought and at Yale in American Studies.
 •Andy earned his doctorate from the University of California at Berkeley and the Graduate Theological Union in a program specially created to accommodate his original theory to explain the way that human civilization has developed.

His doctoral work was published The Parable of the Tribes (University of California Press, 1984;  second edition from SUNY Press, 1995), which was awarded the Erik H. Erikson prize by the

International Society for Political Psychology.

Amherst Virginia Democratic News

This book led the way to a successful career as the author of many published books, most of them seeking to understand the forces that must be dealt with by our country, and by humankind generally, in order to create a good future for ourselves and for the generations to come.


The books are entitled:

•Out of Weakness:  Healing the Wounds that Drive Us to War (Bantam Books, 1988),
 •Sowings and Reapings:  The Cycling of Good and Evil in the Human System (Knowledge Systems, 1989).
 •The Illusion of Choice:  How the Market Economy Shapes Our Destiny (SUNY Press, 1993, with translations published subsequently in Japan and Korea)
 •Fool’s Gold:  The Fate of Values in a World of Goods (Harper Collins, 1993).
 •Debating the Good Society:  A Quest to Bridge America’s Moral Divide (M.I.T. Press, 1999).


Dr. Schmookler is an accomplished author, social thinker, commentator, consultant, speaker and professor.     His career accomplishments include: 

•Serving as an analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. He helped with the analysis of possible future challenges for American policy-makers.
 •Spearheading a project with the Public Agenda Foundation, in which he interviewed the best minds in the country, in various related fields, on how the United States might best achieve security in an age of weapons of mass destruction.
 •Being hired, in the 1990s, by the United States Army to help with a project on the prevention of biological terrorism.
 •Teaching at both the college level (Prescott College, Georgetown University) and at the high school level (Albuquerque Academy).
 •Speaking at forums across the country such as the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars, the Washington Ethical Society, and as Presidential lecturer at the University of Montana.
 •Publishing his commentaries in newspapers across the country for the past thirty-five years, and broadcasting them on radio stations nationwide.
 •Serving as a consultant to one of America’s premier corporations.

But most of all, Andy Schmookler has followed a sense of calling. His first book was inspired by a visionary experience that proved life-changing.   It led him to choose a life dedicated to service.   For the great majority of the past forty years, Andy has done the work he senses he is supposed to do.    Making money and getting ahead have not dictated his life’s course.

Amherst News

For almost twenty years, Andy appeared regularly on WSVA radio out of Harrisonburg, Virginia in an entirely uncompensated role.    He spoke with the people of the Shenandoah Valley about the issues of the day.    He discussed questions of meaning and value that we all face in our day to day lives.     Andy did this because he believes in the importance of meaningful dialogue in the search for truth and mutual understanding.

Beginning in 2004, Andy perceived something troubling about the dynamics operating within American politics.    Believing that the nation was being damaged by a failure to confront the truth about the forces at work before our eyes, Andy devoted himself full-time –again without pay—to investigating and discussing the moral crisis emerging in American society.

It is this same sense of calling, this same dedication to service, and this same sense of America being imperiled, that has led to Andy’s running for Congress in Virginia’s 6th District.     He wants to rally his fellow citizens to uphold the ideals of our American democracy.

Democratic News

Andy is a devoted husband and father.

He’s married to April Moore, a writer and lover of the earth, and between them they have three children:    Nathaniel, who just
 graduated from Harvard and wants to be a writer of fiction;   Terra who lives in California and is a licensed clinical psychologist happily engaged to be married;    and Aaron, married and a teacher and creator of theater.

Andy is proud of his three children, all continuing the family tradition of working hard in service to the values they hold dear.

After twenty-five years of marriage to April, he is more in love with her than ever.


Local  News . . . . . .

Amherst Virginia Headlines

Lynchburg Headlines

Appomattox Headlines

Fluvanna County

Louisa County

Prince Edward County

Buckingham County

Cumberland County

Goochland County


Shaun Winkler, White Supremacist Idaho Republican Sheriff Candidate, Hosts Cross Burning Event

Racist Republican Runs For Sherrif


Shaun Winkler, a white supremacist in Idaho running as a Republican for Bonner County sheriff, is defending his recent cross burning ceremony, after having invited members of the media to attend the event last week.

"Mainstream society looks at cross lighting as a symbol of hate, but it predates the Klan by hundreds of years,"  Winkler told the Bonner County Daily Bee.    "We look at it more as a religious symbol."

Winkler went on to claim the ritual has Scottish roots dating back hundreds of years, but his status as a Ku Klux Klan imperial wizard and his candid admissions of racial and religious prejudice suggest that the decision to burn the cross may take inspiration from a more recent and ugly practice.

"Most people don't know that we don't just oppose the Jews and the Negroes,"  he said, according to the Daily Bee.   "We also oppose sexual predators and drugs of any kind."

While Winkler has claimed that he wouldn't allow his personal beliefs to guide the way he would act as sheriff, his position on sexual predators is admittedly more severe.

He has framed his campaign around the message of cracking down on methamphetamine producers and sex offenders, telling people at a candidate forum this week he favors immediate hangings for those convicted of being sexual predators.

Winkler is one of the remaining members of a diminished, but still active, Aryan Nations presence in Idaho.

Democratic state Rep. Cherie Buckner-Webb, the first black woman to serve in Idaho's state legislature, faced numerous racist attacks from the KKK and other white supremacist groups during her campaign.

Brenda Hammond of the Bonner County Human Rights Task Force says Winkler's political presence is an embarrassment to the rest of the county.

"It shows the need for the human rights task force has not gone away,"   she told the Associated Press.    "Many of us on the task force have really regretted Bonner County's reputation for harboring racism when the vast majority of us don't think like that."

Voters in Bonner County will head to the polls on Tuesday to cast their ballots.

It is understandable that wierdos are drawn to the Republican party.      The hard to comprehend part is why Republicans willing accept all kinds of nutjobs.     Republicans nationwide have a reputation for racism, hate and far worse.     They don't condem it.    The right wing will start a talk radio attack and circle the wagons and protect the dirtbags they welcome to their ranks.     Don't complain about me exposing your business, change it.     Take a stand against the kinds of sillyness your ranks are full of.


GOP Lawmakers Call for Defunding of Public Broadcasting

Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) and Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-Colo.) are calling for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) to be defunded in next year’s federal budget. 

In letters sent Thursday to the chairmen of the Senate and House Appropriations committees, DeMint and Lamborn decried the CPB’s request for an  “enormous”  $445 million in funding for the next fiscal year.

"While so many Americans are making sacrifices around the country to make ends meet, CPB appears unwilling to do the same," they wrote.

They implied the corporation spends irresponsibly, citing compensation amounts for the corporation's president, and argued public broadcasting is obsolete, noting that  "we are fortunate that in today’s media landscape, consumers have many news and entertainment choices, unlike when the 1967 Public Broadcasting Act to create and fund CPB was passed."

DeMint and Lamborn decried the increases in CPB funding that have been approved over the past decade. Between 2001 and 2012, they said, the CPB’s appropriated funding increased by nearly 31 percent, from $340 million to $444.1 million.
"Even though media and information have become more accessible than ever, funding for CPB has exploded,"  they wrote.

CPB is preparing a report for Congress, to be presented next month, about how efficiently it could operate without federal funding.

DeMint and Lamborn said they  "look forward"  to the report about a privately funded CPB.

While public broadcasters have traditionally have to rely partially on donations from the public to operate, a recent federal appeals court decision opened the door to allowing them to air political advertisements — a decision that could provide public stations with a lucrative revenue stream.

But Free Press public media campaign director Josh Stearns defended federal funding of CPB and said DeMint, Lamborn and their colleagues  "who consider this an  ‘enormous’  expense need to spend more time with  ‘the Count’ on Sesame Street."

“Sen. DeMint and Rep. Lamborn have either lost their calculators or are trying to score political points,"  Stearns said, adding that based on public opinion,  "they’re not representing their constituents or serving their country well by playing political games with public broadcasting."

"Members of Congress should take time to recall how last year’s defunding threats met with an extraordinary public backlash," Stearns said.

“The majority of Americans strongly support federal funding for public broadcasting,” he said, regardless of political party.

Do Republicans ever do anything positive, anything that helps anyone?     Republicans are doing to the country what our enemies could never do.     Republicans are the cancer that is destroying the country.    

ACVDN


WORLD NEWS

USA NEWS

POLITICAL

SMALL BUSINESS

ENTERTAINMENT

SPORTS NEWS

WEIGHT LOSS NEWS

HEALTH NEWS

EDUCATION

PERSONAL FINANCE



How Did a Federal Inmate Get on the West Virginia Ballot?

Keith Judd, The Man Who Would Be President


Who filed the paperwork?     Who paid the $2,500 fee to be listed on the ballot?     Is this a dirty trick?       Are the ballot officials in West Virginia lax with their duties?      Read on as I try to answer those and more questions.

Keith Judd, a.k.a. Beaumont Federal Correctional Institution Inmate No. 11593-051 from Texarkana, Texas, won 41 percent of the vote in the Democratic presidential primary in West Virginia against incumbent President Obama.

This begs many questions, from why Obama fared so poorly in the state -- the short answer is coal -- to his ongoing issues with Appalachia but chief among them is a more prosaic and technical concern:    How does a federal inmate and convicted felon wind up on a ballot?


West Virginia law clearly bars any person  "currently under conviction for a felony, including probation or parole, or a court ruling of mental incompetence"  from voting, running for or holding office, according to the Secretary of State's office.     Judd is serving a sentence of 17 and a half years following a 1999 conviction for extortion involving the University of New Mexico.

So how did Judd position himself to potentially collect delegates to the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C. -- as would accrue to anyone who won more than 15 percent of the Democratic vote and filled out the appropriate paperwork?



"He filled out the certificate of announcement. I don't mean to sound flip or anything,"  explained Jack Glance, a spokesman for the West Virginia Secretary of State's Office.     Judd also paid a $2,500 ballot-access filing fee.    Where did a prison inmate get $2,500 from?

"We do not have the authority to determine eligibility of candidates,"  he said.     "That is up to the courts, so somebody has to challenge somebody's eligibility to hold office."

Whether or not someone is under conviction  "is not part of the form that you fill out to run for office.


Now if it comes out that you are under conviction, someone can challenge the candidacy. But no one challenged this candidacy,"    he said.


That doesn't mean Judd is going all the way to Charlotte.     The Democratic Party of West Virginia is pretty certain he'll still be ruled ineligible, thanks to a failure to file the appropriate paperwork on behalf of delegates before party deadlines.


"It's not likely that Mr. Judd will earn any delegates to the national convention,"  said Derek Scarbro, executive director of the West Virginia Democratic Party.      "First and foremost no one filed to run as a delegate for him"    before the filing deadline of 5pm Tuesday.     "And there's no fee or anything,"  he added.

"And then there's also some question of whether he would have been eligible to earn any delegates any way,"   Scarbro continued, as Judd appears not to have made the required filings with the state and national parties naming a delegation chair for his campaign.    And that deadline is long past.

Scarbro blamed Judd's appearance on the ballot on the state, saying,   "The ballot access rules in West Virginia are governed by the state, so that's really a question for the Secretary of State's office and they will tell you that the law in West Virgina does not prohibit people in his situation from getting on the ballot.     " Or, as West Virginia Democratic Party chair -- a volunteer position -- Larry Puccio put it:    "I do not know how he would be able to participate on the ballot... that's not my field of expertise."


But that doesn't answer the question of why the Obama reelection campaign did not challenge Judd's ballot eligibility;    this wasn't even the first time he's faced off against Obama, having also appeared on the Idaho Democratic primary ballot in 2008.    An email to the campaign asking why it did not seek to get him tossed before the primary was not immediately returned.

Perhaps no one cared because West Virginia is pretty much a lost cause for Obama this fall.

Republican John McCain won the state in 2008, and Hillary Clinton took it during the Democratic primaries
earlier that year.     A January 2012 Gallup poll found the president with 33 percent approval rate in the state, and the state's Democratic U.S. Senator has yet to commit to voting for the president's reelection.

What Is Obama's Appeal in Rual America?

In analyzing the returns from last week’s West Virginia Democratic primary, a phalanx of reporters and commentators have explained Hillary Clinton’s landslide victory by pointing out that West Virginians are a special set of Democrats, white, low income and undereducated.      Some, like Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo and Jonathan Tilove of the Newhouse papers, have linked the lackluster performance of Barack Obama in West Virginia to a larger Appalachian problem.     These writers connect the presumptive nominee’s defeat in West Virginia, his previous losses in Ohio and Pennsylvania, and an anticipated poor outing in Tuesday’s Kentucky primary, to the historical, geographic and cultural imperatives shared by Appalachian mountain people.

The legions of pseudonym-laden online posters who follow in political punditry’s wake are less restrained in describing the shortcomings of Sen. Clinton’s Appalachian supporters.     They suggest it has to do with her voters being racist, toothless, shoeless, and prone to marrying their cousins.     In short, they characterize these  “special”  Democrats in much the same terms they used in quieter times to describe Republicans.

Mountain people have long been considered exotic.    The eminent British historian Sir Arnold Toynbee described the residents of Appalachia in 1947 as   “the American counterparts of the latter-day white barbarians of the Old World — Rifis, Albanians, Kurds, Pathans, and Hairy Ainus.”     They have also served as a sort of Rorschach test for the rest of America.     When the country needs iconic war heroes like Alvin York or Jessica Lynch, mountaineers fill the bill. If, periodically, this rich nation needs people to pity, poverty-stricken hillbillies make excellent poster children.     And if backers of the Democratic Party’s presumptive nominee need
to explain why their preferred candidate is not connecting with downscale, rural voters — a demographic that was once key to Democratic electoral success — Appalachia can again answer the call.    Obama supporters and members of the media can place the blame for his poor fortunes not on the candidate or his message, but on the moral failings of those benighted mountain people.


However, the unnerving truth for the erstwhile party of Jefferson may be that Appalachia, for all its legend and lore, is not that different politically from the rest of the small-town and rural parts of the country where 60 million of us live.     And that could mean trouble for the fall.

The primary in West Virginia, a very rural state, was a blowout. Clinton  won it by  41 percent,  and she won all  55 counties. Similarly, in rural Ohio she beat Obama by 33 percent.     In Pennsylvania, a much more metropolitan state, she won 56 of the state’s 63 counties, including Allegheny, Appalachia’s most populous county, where Pittsburgh is located.    Her margins in the rural Appalachian counties of western Pennsylvania were West
Virginia-size.


Still, when you look at the earlier aggregate rural vote on Super Tuesday, the preference for Clinton is clearly not confined to Appalachia.     Combining the results from 22 diverse states in the Northeast, South, Midwest and West on Feb. 5, Clinton beat Obama 55 percent to 38 percent among rural voters, according to an
analysis in DailyYonder.com,  the Center for Rural Strategies.
Those aren’t West Virginia margins, but they aren’t close.     They shine a light on a vulnerability that Democrats have shared through the last several election cycles.


The reality is that when Democratic candidates run competitively in rural America, they win national elections.     And when they get creamed in rural America, they lose.      That was Bill Clinton’s reality in winning as it was the reality for Al Gore and John Kerry in narrowly losing.


Nationally prominent Democrats have often come into the mountains of eastern Kentucky to see and to be seen.     Perhaps that’s because the idea that government should keep an eye on people who were not prospering was once part of the essence of the Democratic Party.      Or perhaps it’s because they know there are
votes here.


LBJ came to Martin County just before announcing his War on Poverty in 1964.      In 1968, Sen. Robert Kennedy made
a fabled tour of small Kentucky coal towns shortly before announcing his own candidacy.      In 1988, Jesse Jackson
brought out thousands of mountain people for his presidential campaign rally in Hazard.     Sen. Paul Wellstone reprised the RFK tour in 1998 while exploring his own presidential prospects.     And last year long before the primaries John Edwards brought his  “two Americas”  tour to the mountains to attempt to engage the press and the greater public in a conversation about income disparity.   He was moved and concerned by what he saw in Kentucky.  Edwards tried to discuss Appalachian poverty with several reporters from the national press.     They were far more interested in the size of his house and the price of his haircut.

 Other than Edwards, there haven’t been many visitors.    Maybe the party that once welcomed Appalachian coal miners and hillside farmers has moved on.       The national Democratic Party has become younger, richer, hipper and far less interested in preserving an identity forged in the Great Depression.      Who really wants a political party full of poor mountaineers?      Perhaps, in the minds of some,  “Coal Miner’s Daughter”  has been supplanted by
“Deliverance.”

That the Democrats have all but abandoned rural America in policy and practice during recent presidential election cycles may have to do with a faulty demographic map — a lack of awareness of what it really takes to win a presidential election — or it just may have to do with their candidates’ comfort level out beyond the sprawl.

Still, it says something about who wins and loses in the fall. Democrats should not be surprised when rural voters drift toward those institutions that stick around, like the churches, which often reinforce socially conservative ideas, and when rural voters prefer those politicians who actually ask for their votes.


A new bipartisan poll of rural voters in battleground states, conducted by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner, shows that Barack Obama is in a similar position to that of John Kerry five months before the 2004 election.     Obama trailed John McCain by 9 points.    Kerry trailed Bush by 9 in the rural battleground in June
2004.

In 2004, Kerry lost the rural battleground by about 20 percent and with it a close election.    The rural vote was particularly telling in the pivotal state of Ohio, where a massive Democratic get-out-the-vote effort in cities and suburbs was more than offset by increased Republican success with rural voters.    Many of those rural voters
were Appalachian and blue collar, people who back before the name-calling were reliable Democrats.    They gave Bush a second term.

Yet there is plenty in the numbers to give Obama heart, starting with the 9-point deficit that he and Kerry have in common five months out from the general election.    When Kerry was down 9 in rural counties, he had a commanding lead nationally.     And that was before he was Swift-boated and before a campaign that advocated almost nothing for rural communities other than the Democratic Party’s reflexive support for farm subsidies, which
largely benefit corporate farms.     (Only 1 percent of rural Americans earn their primary living on farms. Democrats don’t appear know this.)


Surprisingly, Obama has already achieved the same standing in the polls that Kerry enjoyed when things were going well.     And for Obama, this comes after weeks of relentless news coverage of his ex-preacher and after the senator’s own costly  “those people”  moment when he was caught at a private fundraiser using broad stereotypes to characterize small-town and rural voters. (They are bitter. They cling.)

Polling also shows is that rural communities are experiencing measurable economic distress, especially with the out-of-control price of fuel.    Rural voters express concern over the mounting cost of healthcare.    They are also measurably displeased with the country’s direction.      On the issues, there is clearly prime territory for Obama to seize.

Democratic pollster Anna Greenberg says that this year the presidential election could be up for grabs in rural parts of swing states.      “This competitiveness reflects the ongoing problems facing the Republican brand, as well as the deep economic anxiety rural voters feel.      Concerns about the cost of living are intense, particularly gas prices in a part of the country where many drive long distances to work.     Moreover, there is real ambivalence about all the presidential choices — each candidate has a real opportunity to define the race on his terms.”

As of now, it would appear there is a cultural divide between Obama and these voters that resembles what we have seen in the past for a variety of Democratic presidential candidates, including George McGovern and Michael Dukakis.”

How Obama fares in rural America may, in the end, have to do with whether he shows up.     In politics not showing up and losing are kissing cousins.     Obama made three visits to West Virginia.     In Kentucky, he limited himself to appearances in the state’s two biggest cities, Louisville and Lexington.    

It is going to be an interesting election.



Amherst County Democrats Meet the second tuesday of every month at various locations across the county.     Visit Facebook or the Website for more info.     Click links below and we'll take you there.
Visit AM Dems on Facebook

Visit AM Dems Website    


AMHERST COUNTY VIRGINIA   DEMOCRATIC NEWS

Exercise Your Right To Vote

If You Don't Vote - You Don't Matter

Blog Archive