Keeping In Touch with politics and other issues in Central Virginia .....The Virginia 22nd Senate District and The 6th Congressional District......Vote Democratic for a Better Future....Protect Your Benefits

Democratic Committee Meeting

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

GOP Settles for Romney, Apathy Sky High

Mitt's Money Outlasts Rival's Bank Accounts

The Republican Winner and Number 1 GOP Conservative


Republicans despise Mitt and the reason is simple.   Mitt is a solid gold fake.    Democrats hold different positions on the issues than Republicans and thus the Republicans oppose Democrats.   Republicans know that Democrats have long held values and rarely flip-flop on an issue where as Mitt can go any way the wind blows.   Mitt Romney is a floater who has no center or core.   Which ever group he is speaking to he will pretend to hold their views as life long positions.    Each group and each Republican know Mitt is lying to them and that he will say anything to get elected.   Is it any wonder Republicans are having a hard time supporting this phoney?

14 Bald-Faced Mitt Romney Flip-Flops, Research By John McCain

This comes from the 2008 John McCain campaign's research book on Mitt Romney.   In over 200 painstakingly researched pages, it notes every slip-up, political fib, and potential liability for Romney going forward. 

And of course it picks apart all the times Romney has said one thing, and then when the political winds changed, said something else.

#1 On Immigration - For A Path To Citizenship, Then Against

FLIP :  “Gov. Mitt Romney expressed support ... for an immigration program that places large numbers of illegal residents on the path toward citizenship ... Romney said illegal immigrants should have a chance to obtain citizenship.”  (Evan Lehmann, “Romney Supports Immigration Program, But Not Granting ‘Amnesty’,” The Lowell
Sun, 3/30/06)

FLOP:  “[I] think I’m best off to describe my own positions. And my positions, I think I’ve just described for
you – secure the border, employment verification and no special pathway to citizenship. I feel that’s the course we ought to take.” (CNN’s “The Situation Room,” 5/22/07)

2) On George W. Bush's Tax-Cuts

FLIP: “[R]omney spoke at the 10th annual legislative conference organized by U.S. Rep. Martin T. Meehan (D-Lowell) and met with the Massachusetts delegation. ... Congressional sources said that a point of contention arose when Romney refused to take a position on Bush’s massive, 10-year tax cut plan.” (Noelle Straub, “Romney
Talks Policy With Bush Staffers, Mass. Delegation,” Boston Herald, 4/11/03)

FLOP: "McCain opposed President Bush’s tax cuts, Romney noted. ‘I supported them,’ the former governor said.”
(Lee Bandy, “Romney Targeting McCain,” The State [SC], 2/4/07)

3) Anti-Reagan then, now Pro-Reagan.

FLIP: “I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I’m not trying to return to Reagan- Bush,” Mitt Romney said during a debate with Ted Kennedy

FLOP: "'Ronald Reagan is one of my heroes,' Romney said as he praised Reagan’s strategy for winning the Cold
War: ‘We win; they lose.’” (Michael Levenson, “Romney Links Gay Marriage, US Prestige,” The Boston Globe, 2/26/05)

4) On The National Rifle Association And Gun Laws
FLIP:  “[Romney] said he will take stands that put him at odds with some traditional ultra- conservative
groups, and cited his support for the assault rifle ban and the Brady gun control law. ‘That’s not going to make me the hero of the NRA,’ he said. ‘I don’t line up with a lot of special interest groups.’” (Andrew Miga,
“Mitt Rejects Right-Wing Aid,” Boston Herald, 9/23/94)

FLOP:  Romney told a Derry, N.H., audience, ‘I’m after the NRA’s endorsement. I’m not sure they’ll give it to
me. I hope they will. I also joined because if I’m going to ask for their endorsement, they’re going to ask for mine.’” (Glen Johnson, “Romney Calls Himself A Longtime Hunter,” The Associated Press, 4/5/07)

5) On Whether He Even Owns A Gun (This story changed within just a few days)
FLIP:  "I have a gun of my own. I go hunting myself. I’m a member of the NRA and believe firmly in the right to bear arms," Romney said. (Glenn And Helen glennandhelenshow.com, 1/10/07) 


FLOP:  "Asked by reporters at the gun show Friday whether he personally owned a gun, Romney said he did not. He said one of his sons, Josh, keeps two guns at the family vacation home in Utah, and he uses them ‘from time to time.’” (Scott Helman, “Romney Retreats On Gun Control,” The Boston Globe, 1/14/07)

6) Is the planet warming? Mitt probably agreed with you at one time or another.

FLIP:  "I think the global warming debate is now pretty much over and people recognize the need associated with providing sources which do not generate the heat that is currently provided by fossil fuels ...” (Jack Coleman, “Massachusetts Governor Urges Use Of Alternative Energy,” Cape Cod Times, 3/14/03)

“I concur that climate change is beginning to [have an] effect on our natural resources and that now is the time to take action ...”   (“Romney OK With Plan On Emissions,” Boston Herald, 7/24/03)

FLOP:   “I have to tell you with regards to global warming that that’s something, which, you’re right, the scientists haven’t entirely resolved, but no question about one thing, it’s getting warmer, and a lot of good reasons for us to use less energy, to use it more efficiently and to develop sources here in this country that could allow us to be more independent of foreign sources.” (CNBC’s “Kudlow & Company,” 2/7/07)
 

“Unfortunately, some in the Republican Party are embracing the radical environmental ideas of the liberal left.  As governor, I found that thoughtful environmentalism need not be anti-growth and anti-jobs. But Kyoto-style sweeping mandates, imposed unilaterally in the United States, would kill jobs, depress growth and shift manufacturing to the dirtiest developing nations. Republicans should never abandon pro-growth conservative principles in an effort to embrace the ideas of Al Gore.” (Romney For President, Press Release, 2/23/07)

7) Don't Ask Don't Tell? Don't Ask Mitt Romney

FLIP:   In 1994 “[Romney] called President Bill Clinton’s ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ military policy ‘the first of a number of steps that will ultimately lead to gays and lesbians being able to serve openly and honestly in our nation’s military.’” (Dan Balz and Shailagh Murray, “Mass. Governor’s Rightward Shift Raises Questions,” The Washington Post, 12/21/06)

FLOP:   “[Romney] defended his policy switch on gays in the military. He said when he first heard the phrase ‘don’t ask, don’t tell,’ he thought it was ‘kind of a silly phrase that didn’t make a lot of sense.’ But the last 10 years have convinced him that the policy is working and there is no reason to change it, he said.”  (Alexa Aguilar, “Romney Campaigns In Chicago,” Chicago Tribune, 4/12/07)


8) Has your position on same-sex marriage changed? So has Mitt Romney's.

FLIP:  When a 2002 Constitutional Amendment was proposed to ban same-sex marriage, Romney opposed it. “Romney’s family members signed the petition to put it on the ballot ‘without reading the fine print,’ [Romney aide Eric] Fehrnstrom said, but he has no reason to believe they do not support it. ‘Mitt did not know they signed it, and Mitt does not support it,’ he said. ‘As far as Mitt is concerned, it goes farther than current law, and therefore it’s unnecessary.’” (Rick Klein, “Romney Kin Signed Petition To Ban Same-Sex Marriage,” The Boston Globe, 3/22/02)

FLOP:  “Just two weeks before lawmakers resume a Constitutional Convention to vote on a proposed ballot initiative to ban same-sex marriage, Gov. Mitt Romney will stand with the supporters of the measure to call on the Legislature to back it. Romney will join petition backers in a State House press event today to urge the Legislature to pass the Protection of Marriage Amendment when the Constitutional Convention reconvenes July 12, authorizing a 2008 ballot question asking voters to define marriage as between one man and one woman.” (Kimberly Atkins and Kate Gibson, “Mitt Joining Supporters Of Anti-Gay Wed Initiative,” Boston Herald, 6/28/06)


9) On embryonic stem cell research, Romney's still developing a fully-formed position.

FLIP:  “Speaking at a bioethics forum, GOP gubernatorial hopeful Mitt Romney yesterday endorsed embryonic stem cell research ... [Romney] endorsed embryonic stem cell research, saying the controversial science might one day help treat his wife’s multiple sclerosis in addition to numerous other degenerative diseases. ... Romney spoke extensively about his position on stem cell research, which also involves embryo destruction.” (Raja Mishra, “Romney Endorses Stem Cell Research, Is Silent On Cloning,” The Boston Globe, 6/14/02)

FLOP: ...On Feb. 10, 2005 ... Romney came out strongly against the cloning technique ... He vowed to press for legislation to criminalize the work. Romney’s opposition stunned scientists, lawmakers, and observers because of his past statements endorsing, at least in general terms, embryonic stem cell research.” (Scott Helman, “Romney’s Journey To The Right,” The Boston Globe, 12/17/06)


10) Favorite Book?   Well, that depends.

FLIP:   Fox News’ MARTHA MCCALLUM:  And an interesting response to his favorite novel. ROMNEY: “Actually the one by L. Ron Hubbard, I hate to think ... I’m not in favor of his religion by any means, but he wrote a book called ‘Battlefield Earth’ that was a very fun science fiction book.” (Fox News’ “Fox & Friends,” 4/30/07)

FLOP   (Maybe just a hedge):  "Asked about his comments during a Fox News interview Monday that L. Ron Hubbard’s 'Battlefield Earth' is his favorite novel, Romney said Huckleberry Finn is his favorite fiction and that the book by Hubbard, who founded Scientology, is his favorite science fiction reading.” (Mary Anne Ostrom, “Education Should Determine Immigrants’ Legal Status, Mitt Romney Says,” The [San Jose, CA] Mercury News, 5/1/07)


11) His Own Health-Care Initiative. He's Not Sure About That Either.

FLIP:   "In a Colonial-era hall, with a fife-and-drum corps marching in with him, Gov. Mitt Romney (R) signed a bill Wednesday requiring all Massachusetts residents to purchase health insurance -- portraying the measure as a historic solution to health-care costs, even as questions emerge about whether the state can afford it. The signing [was] staged with a near-presidential attention to theatrics and slogan-bearing banners...” (David A. Fahrenthold, “Mass. Marks Health-Care Milestone,” The Washington Post, 4/13/06)

FLOP:   "As governor of Massachusetts he signed a bipartisan law intended to ensure that every resident has coverage. Romney touted it as an innovative free-market solution. Yet these days, Romney ... is much more likely to present his state’s universal coverage law as not a model to copy but an example for other states to learn from. He’s now a critic of his own biggest achievement.” (Sean Higgins, “Ex-Gov. Romney Keeps Distance From His Own Mass. Health Plan,” Investor’s Business Daily, 3/7/07)


12) Tax Pledges are beneath Romney, until the presidency was in front of him.

FLIP:   “Four years ago, Mitt Romney broke with GOP tradition and refused to sign the [Americans for Tax Reform] pledge [to ‘oppose and veto any and all efforts to increase taxes’].” (Lisa Wangsness, “Healey Will Sign Antitax Pledge,” The Boston Globe, 9/4/06)

“Romney’s Gubernatorial Campaign Spokesman, Eric Fehrnstrom, Dismissed Such Pledges At The Time As ‘Government By Gimmickry.’” (Scott Helman, “Romney Finds ‘No New Taxes’ Promise Suits Him After All,” The Boston Globe, 1/5/07)

FLOP:   “Almost five years after he refused to sign a ‘no new taxes’ pledge during his campaign for governor, Mitt Romney announced ... that he had done just that, as his campaign for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination began in earnest.” (Scott Helman, “Romney Finds ‘No New Taxes’ Promise Suits Him After All,” The Boston Globe, 1/5/07)


 13) Money in politics? Sometimes its good, sometimes it is bad.

FLIP:   “Romney also said he advocates spending limits on congressional elections, even suggesting that the current race against Sen. Edward M. Kennedy should have a $6 million spending cap.” (Frank Phillips, “Romney, Vowing To Live It, Touts Congress Reform Plan,” The Boston Globe, 7/27/94)

"[Mitt Romney] once touted dramatic restructuring measures such as taxing political contributions and placing spending limits on federal campaigns.” (Alexander Bolton, “Romney’s About-Face On Campaign Funding,” The Hill, 2/8/07)

FLOP:  “Romney noted his foe from Arizona wrote the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform law that restricts certain types of contributions. ‘That’s a terrible piece of legislation,’ Romney said. ‘It hasn’t taken the money out of politics. ... (But) it has hurt my party.’” (Lee Bandy, “Romney Targeting McCain,” The State, 2/4/07)


14) NOW THE BIG ONE: During his 1994 Senate Run, Mitt Romney argued that he was more pro-choice than Ted Kennedy

FLIP:   “When Kennedy called him ‘multiple choice,’ Romney demanded an extra rebuttal. He revealed that a close relative died of an illegal abortion years ago and said, ‘Since that time, my mother and my family have been committed to the belief that we can believe as we want, but we will not force our beliefs on others on that matter, and you will not see me wavering on that.’” (Joan Vennochi, “Romney’s Revolving World,” The Boston Globe, 3/2/06)

 “I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country. I have since the time that my mom took that position when she ran in 1970 as a US Senate candidate. I believe that since Roe v. Wade has been the law for 20 years we should sustain and support it.” (Joan Vennochi, “Romney’s Revolving World,” The Boston Globe, 3/2/06)


When he went to conservative Utah, that tune changed.

FLOP:  “When I am asked if I am pro-choice or pro-life, I say I refuse to accept either label.” (Glen Warchol, “This Is The Place, But Politics May Lead Romneys Elsewhere,” The Salt Lake Tribune, 2/14/99)
 

But I'm running for office in Massachusetts again, so I'm pro-choice again
FLIP:   “I will preserve and protect a woman’s right to choose, and am devoted and dedicated to honoring my word in that regard. I will not change any provisions of Massachusetts’ pro-choice laws.” (2002 Romney-O’Brien Gubernatorial Debate, Suffolk University, Boston, MA, 10/29/02)


In 2002, Romney Offered His Completed NARAL Questionnaire, Filled Out With “Mostly Abortion-Rights Positions,” To The Media Even Before Returning It To NARAL. “Yesterday, Romney also aimed to head off confusion about his stance on abortion rights by answering a Mass National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League questionnaire with mostly abortion-rights positions. He offered the questionnaire to the press even before he returned it to MassNARAL...”

Then he started thinking of national office as a Republican, and he happened to have a revelation

FLOP:   "Romney said he had a change of heart on the issue after speaking with a stem-cell researcher, Dr. Douglas Melton. Romney claims Melton said  ‘Look, you don’t have to think about this stem cell research as a moral issue, because we kill the embryos after 14 days.’ 

‘It hit me very hard that we had so cheapened the value of human life in a Roe v. Wade environment that it was important to stand for the dignity of human life,’ Romney says.” (Karen Tumulty, “What Romney Believes,” Time, 5/21/07)


Mitt Romney is the Biggest Dirtbag I've Ever Run Against and since I've run against GW Bush that's really saying something.


It is no wonder John McCain called Mitt Romney the most disgusting excuse of a  politician he had ever seen.    No matter who is reading this, No matter which party you support, No matter if you aren't in to politics at all, No matter any-all-and everything.    At some point Mitt Romney has agreed with you if only for a day or two.   If you have ever attended a Mitt Romney speech then for a few magical moments you were listening to someone that for that instant agreed with your every thought and supported your every desire.   Mitt Romney is a solid gold phoney and a master of pandering.  

Many years ago before instant news and cable 24 hour news coverage Mitt would have been KING.   Sadly you can no longer fly between cities and give speeches that flip flop your support on the issues.    Today you have trouble getting away with the outright lie and must take and defend stands in an open and honest manner.    Mitt could have been a contender 75 years ago but today he is a phoney and a loser.   Are the Republicans excited?    Even Republicans have a BS Limit on what they will accept from their candidate.    Though the limit is limbo party low it is still head and shoulders above Mitt Romney.


Local  News

Amherst Virginia Headlines

Lynchburg Headlines



Rick Santorum Drops Out of the Presidential Race

Rick is young.    He can follow in Ron Paul's footsteps and run for President every 4 years until he is in his 70.     Considering Mitt's money he may run in the republican primary in 2016.   Rick maintains that if Newt had shown the good sense to drop out months ago he could have defeated Romney and saved the party from the butt whipping that waits just down the road.


Newt Gingrich is hanging in there to help keep his image alive for the purpose of paid speeches and DVD's and Books he and his newest wife are hawking.   It's a tradition for Ron Paul to run and use the travel as a free vacation.   Ron Paul has never held any honest expectation of being a winner.    All the other temporary front runners that came and went in short order while promoting Books and TV shows are all yesterdays news.   The GOP has settled for Mitt.    No other primary (by either party) has ever been such a clown show as was the Republican Primary this time around.   The Democrats have had one or two zany charcters running for short periods of time but never a circus like the Republicans produced in 2012.

Rick Santorum announced Tuesday that he is suspending his presidential campaign, all but bringing to a close the 2012 GOP presidential contest and effectively handing the nomination to Mitt Romney.

“We made a decision over the weekend that, while this presidential race for us is over — for me — and we will suspend our campaign effective today, we are not done fighting,” Santorum said at a campaign event in Gettysburg, Pa., the site of the historic and pivotal Civil War battle.

The former Pennsylvania senator had been Romney’s top opponent, but he suffered a trio of defeats last week in Wisconsin, Maryland and the District of Columbia, and over the weekend his daughter, Bella, was hospitalized for the second time this campaign due to complications from a rare genetic disorder.

In announcing his decision, Santorum said Bella’s condition caused him to reconsider his campaign but that she “is a fighter and doing extraordinarily well.”

He did not endorse or urge the delegates that he has won to support another candidate, but spokesman Hogan Gidley told MSNBC that the Romney campaign has requested a meeting about an endorsement, which he said Santorum is “open” to.

Santorum is currently second in the delegate race, but he would have to win upwards of three-fourths of the remaining delegates in order to secure the nomination.

Instead, he seemed to be hoping that Romney would fall short of the delegate threshold and that he could snatch the nomination at the Republican National Convention in August.

Santorum called Romney before his announcement Tuesday to inform him of his decision to drop out, according to a Romney campaign official.

“This race was as improbable as any race you’ll ever see for president,” Santorum said.

Rick never stood a chance.    If he had dropped out months ago like anyone with good sense would have done I could have beaten Romney and been the next president.     The last time Santorum ran in his home state he was beaten to a pulb and finished 20 points behind.      Rick played the spoiler role and now the party is stuck with Mitt Romney.     Republicans can forget 2012.


Former House speaker Newt Gingrich and Texas Rep. Ron Paul remain in the campaign, but neither has shown the ability to be a consistent alternative to Romney.    Gingrich, in particular, has seen his campaign hit a rough patch of late.    Gingrich finished fourth in the last two major contests and revealed over the weekend that his campaign was $4.5 million in debt.    He will continue to try to raise money to pay his debts all the way to the convention.     Gingrich offered to drop out completely if Romney would pay off his debts.    No appears to have been Mitt's answer to Newt.

Santorum’s exit virtually assures that Romney will secure the Republican Party’s nomination, though he so far has secured only about 60 percent of the delegates that he needs.   

The situation that no one has thought of is that everybody except Romney drops out and he still can't get enough delegates to secure the nomination.    Romney's problem has never been the 22 other republicans that ran in the primary.     His problem was always that the people did not like, trust or want him and that is still his problem.     The dogs won't eat the dog food.   

Some will sit the election out while others will hold their noses and try to vote republican.     Many republicans feel it is best to give Obama 4 more years and field a decent candidate in 2016.     A great many politicians feel endorseing Romney will hurt their futures in the party.     Voting for a candidate you dislike simply because there is an R after the name is more than some can bring themselves to do.     It is a bridge too far.    Only the really old and partisan can vote for anything republican.

In a statement, Romney congratulated his opponent.

“Sen. Santorum is an able and worthy competitor, and I congratulate him on the campaign he ran,”  Romney said.    “He has proven himself to be an important voice in our party and in the nation.    We both recognize that what is most important is putting the failures of the last three years behind us and setting America back on the path to prosperity.”

Republican leaders in recent weeks have been slowly coalescing around Romney, calling for an end to an increasingly arduous campaign that some say threatens the party’s chances in November.
That trend continued Tuesday, with Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad endorsing Romney shortly before Santorum’s announcement and Florida Gov. Rick Scott endorsing Romney shortly afterward.

(Scott’s endorsement may not help Romney — he’s quite unpopular as governor of a key swing state — but today is a good day for that endorsement to get lost in the news.)

“Mitt Romney will be our party’s nominee and it is critical that all Republicans coalesce behind Gov. Romney and focus on electing him as president so he can put the policies in place to create jobs, turn our economy around and get federal spending under control,” Scott said in a statement.

A new Washington Post/ABC News poll this week showed a majority of Republican-leaning Americans — 52 percent — said Santorum should stay in the campaign, while 43 percent said he should drop out.    64% said Romney was a problem even if there was no one else running against him.     31% of those surveyed said they considered Romney qualified to be President.     71% thought Romney should close his Cayman Island Investment Accounts and cancell his Swiss Bank Account since no other President or person running for President has ever been involved in such a mess and embarrisment to the party.      74% agreed that a 14% tax bracket for a multi-millionaire was nothing less than a scandal and that Congress should take action to ensure tax fairness for all Americans.

By suspending his campaign rather than ending it, Santorum can continue to raise money to retire any remaining debt he might have.
In the end, Santorum won contests in 11 states, but all of his primary victories were relegated to the South, and he failed to win any of a string of primaries in the Midwest in recent weeks.

Many Ron Paul supporters are broken hearted that drugs and prostitution continue to be illegal.     Decriminalizing these issues has always been a big part of a Ron Paul campaign.    Texans sent him to congress for the last 22 years hoping to get a piece of the Ron Paul magic and a roll back on the civel rights legislation.


Ron Paul never for a second considered himself as having the slightest chance of winning and time has proved him astute and correct.     The only money he ever needed was for a plane ticket (coach) to the next town he was giving a speech in.     Many nights he slept on the sofas of supporters and ate at fast food outlets.     For anyone wishing to return to the 1950's and live that life style Ron Paul's latest loss must be a terrible burden to shoulder.     In all likelyhood this is Ron's last run as he is retiring but all is not lost.     Ron's son Rand is the old man's equell in every way and he may pick up the torch.     The fruit didn't fall too far from the tree.

Romney can appoint Santorum Secretary of Education.    Santorum then can shut down the colleges that do nothing but manufacture elitists, and compel home schooling of younger children.   Then, all of the empty school buildings can be turned into crisis pregnancy centers.    I think the Republicans have a plan to rebuild the Arc and replant the Garden of Eden.


USA and World NEWS
USA NEWS

WORLD NEWS

POLITICAL

SMALL BUSINESS

PERSONAL FINANCE

EDUCATION


The Republican Party is Dead; Only the Name Survives

People are talking about how the Republicans might do in the elections this November.    I say they can't win because the Republican party no longer exists.    Those who claim to be the Republicans aren't.    The party is dead.    Only the name survives.

This is not the party of Abraham Lincoln.    Ronald Reagan was far to liberal for today's Republicans.    What's left of what the Republicans were is the Ku Klux Klan wing, neocons like Dick Cheney, and those who are against the kind of people who think and are proud of it. 

We are against class warfare and for tax breaks.    No one should be allowed to vote without proper identification and we oppose the health care act.     Learn to speak english or get out of the country.

The party is owned by corporate puppets that apologize to British Petroleum.  The party is led by Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin.    Republicans are only concerned about the deficit when they are out of power and spend like mad when they are in power.

Republicans need to take responsibility.    They need to stand for something more than empty slogans.      There are no ideas there anymore.     It's all about their own self interest.     So Republicans cannot possibly win because Republicans no longer exist.

The GOP is going down in flames, and they're trying to pass as many anti-woman, anti-children and "I GOT MINE" bills as their demented minds can dream up.      The days of old white men controlling U.S. Politics is going the way of the candle maker and the blacksmith.
 
Once the Republican Party has been dead for 10 years or so the local republican voters will realize the party is gone.   Maby they will hear it on TV or a child will return from vacation and tell them.   As long a Fox News denies the death of the republican party no real republican will believe it.

Demographic Trends in the Republican Party

Age Range            Percent
 18-27                      6%
 28-37                     14%
 38-47                     15%
 48-57                     24%
 58+                       37%

To start, the obvious conclusion from the breakdown of ages is that most Republican voters are quite old.    The party will probably lose over a third of its members to old age in the next 20 years and has only tiny base of younger voters to replace them.

The Republican Party is not a party of the young.    More than two thirds of those polled were over 48 years old and only 20% were in the bottom two age brackets.    This raises the question of what kind of a future a party has whose membership averages close to retirement age with very few new members becoming involved at or near college age.     There's not much time left for those who currently lead the party.     Membership is already shrinking and the trend suggested in these polls is one which would leave the Republican party as a much smaller minority party in less than a generation.

With this in mind it is easy to see why Republicans are pushing so hard to restrict the old, poor and minority voters from getting their rights at the poll.   These groups vote Democratic by large margins.

The Republican Party is not nearly as socially conservative as generally believed.     The support for "Family Values" and even "Right to Life" issues is relatively small across the board.     This suggests that for the younger generation of Republicans social issues are an absolute non-priority, or at best issues of convenience which they don't prioritize significantly.

This is further born out by candidate polling.    In recent polls older voters go much more heavily for socially conservative candidates like Rick Perry and Herman Cain, while younger voters are attracted to the more socially moderate or socially neutral candidates like Ron Paul and Gary Johnson.

In the older age group support for social conservatives is three times support for social moderates, while in the younger group the support splits almost 50-50.    Given that some social moderates are also among the most fiscally conservative candidates this bears out the trend towards much less interest in socially conservative views among younger Republican voters.

It is inevitable that the socially conservative 23% of the oldest population group will die off and do so fairly quickly.    They will almost all be gone within two decades.    In addition to reducing the total membership of the party by as much as a third, they will also leave behind a party with very little interest in social conservatism.


You can draw your own conclusions from this, but at the very least it means that prioritizing social issues is a big mistake in the long term as it turns away younger voters and panders to a vocal minority which won't be around for long.

Bottom line, the republican party must modernize or die.   Old white men are on the way out and the young don't share their ultra conservative social agendas.


Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley calls Obama "Stupid" on Twitter

Senator and Iowa Corn God Chuckles Grassley.     Elected by the people, serves the exclusive needs of the insurance companies.     Chuck has a corn cob hidden on his person, guess where.


Iowa is a small, insignificant state that gets paid for not growing corn and gets fed free pancakes every 4 years by republicans seeking to win their parties presidental primary.    This will clarify what and where Senator Grassley hails from and may explain his command of the english language as well as his typing style.

After Senator Chuck Grassley sent an almost unintelligable tweet attacking President Obama and calling him stupid David Axelrod sent Grassley the following message.

"Heads up, Sen. Grassley,"  "I think a 6-year-old hijacked your account and is sending out foolish Tweets just to embarrass you!"

Read or attempt to read Grassley's original tweet and decide for yourself who is stupid. 
 
"Constituents askd why i am not outraged at PresO attack on supreme court independence,”   “Bcause Am ppl r not stupid as this x prof of con law."

Grassley is a fully owned and controlled tool of the insurance industry and an embarrisment to the people of Iowa.   This is by no means Grassley's first journey down the path of stupidity.   Sen. Grassley reffered to Newt Gingrich as a  "Constitutional Scholar" with a straight face.  

Grassley is living proof that Lincoln was right when he said keep your mouth shut and people may think you're a fool.   Open your mouth and remove all doubt.   Chuckles it's better to keep your mouth shut.

President Obama should remember this.   If an idiot is giving you a hard time, you must be doing something right.    Joe Walsh and the moron who yelled you lie-in the state of the union address and now Chuckles Grassley.   Looks like the President is fireing on all cylinders.   Keep up the good work Mr. President.

I am tempted to tell the story of how a 15 year old Chuck Grassley was injured in a freak expermental accident involving an automatic milking machine but if I did I would have to folow it up with how he was reinjured in the same manner by the same sort of machine years later at 23.   These types of stories and interludes with 
farm animals appear to be part of small town Iowa life best left untold. 

Grassley may be a genius.   It appears he has hooked  up a Speak And Spell to the Internet.  

Senator Grassley has an unusual form of Alzheimer's that causes the patient to communicate more and more like a 11-year-old 
girl.

A great statesman shall always be known by his tweets.   Grassley spent his childhood riding the really small school bus. 

Welcome to America, Chuck Grassley.    Please learn English or get out of the country.

There once was a Senator named Grassley,
 He sent out a tweet; it was ghastly.
Now you do the next two lines.


Remember  Tweeting  Knocks about 40 points off your IQ.     If you're a republican you don't have but a point or two to play with.


ACV  DEMOCRATIC  NEWS
Register and Vote


Monday, April 9, 2012

GOP, 51% Dim Witts and Nut Jobs

GOP, Magnet for Dim Witts and Nut Jobs


Trying to keep up with the thoughts of the GOP is more fun than watching SNL.


Not all the members of the GOP are Dim Witts and Nut Jobs.    To be fair only about 30% are but that's enough to diminish the seriousness with which the republicans are a part of the two party system.    The partisanship of the Grand Old Party is so great that they are happy to pander to anyone and proud to claim the votes of any group without reguard to their talking points.   Lets take a close look at the elements that make up today's republican party.


From Georgia, Ohio, and Tennessee Republican polls in addition to looking at the Presidential race we also polled on some of the issues that have been in the news recently:   Rush Limbaugh and the reemergence of birtherism.

                                I've Got Mine, F... You

Our numbers suggest that Rush Limbaugh has seen significant erosion in his popularity with Republican voters.    The last time we polled him nationally he was at 80/12 with GOPers.   But now we find him below 50% in all three of these states: he's at 45/28 in Ohio, 46/29 in Tennessee, and 44/30 in Georgia.


Republican women in particular have become very skeptical about Limbaugh.    He's at only 39/28 with them in Ohio and 36/30 in Tennessee.   Republicans deny they have a war on women going on but it seems women see it differently.


Feelings about Limbaugh produce a pretty big divide in  GOP voters.     Rush still has his radio show but his influence is diminished.   The GOP has decided they can no longer carry the hate filled rants of a radio fool as the voice of their party.   Just as a broken clock is right twice a day so are the dim witts and nut jobs of the republican party ocassionally right.   With sufficient work and effort the republicans may someday match the broken clock in correctness but as for now think of the expression once in a blue moon when looking at how often they get it right.

Karl Rove, Man From The Past

Karl being removed from recent GOP Meeting

Karl Rove, who served as White House chief of staff under President George W. Bush, is warning Republicans to avoid the "birther" debate.    Karl is under extreme scrunity from the right wing who feel he is too soft and moderate to be a member of today's republican party.    Polls show 51% of republicans consider Karl Rove to be an outdated and useless piece of the past best pushed aside and forgotten as was done with G W Bush.   Were Karl to be deceased the party could rewrite his history and up date him to today's republican standards as was done with Ronald Reagan.

The Gipper before TV and Color Photography
                           The Republican Good Old Days

"Within our party, we've got to be very careful about allowing these people who are the birthers and the 9/11-deniers to get too high a profile and say too much without setting the record straight,"   Rove said.

The Absolute Truth

Rove was discussing a survey released this week by the Democratic polling firm Public Policy Polling, showing that 51 percent of Republican voters likely to participate in next year's presidential primaries are "birthers."    I think this poll is a fluke and that only 30% of the GOP falls in the nut job category but when it comes to counting dim witt republicans one never knows.    There is no doubt that the intellect of the republican party is dropping fast.


The term "birthers" refers to those who are skeptical of whether President Obama was born in the United States and is thus qualified to be president.  The "birther movement" began during Mr. Obama's presidential campaign.    It has steadily persisted through Mr. Obama's presidency, in spite of overwhelming evidence he was born in the United States -- including his 1961 birth announcement, printed in two Hawaii newspapers.


Rove said Tuesday that regardless of the true percentage of Republicans who question the president's origins, "it ought to be less."   People who demonstrate no sense of reality on this issue are suspect of having zero sanity on other issues.


"We need the leaders of our party to say, 'Look, stop falling into the trap of the White House and focus on the real issues,'" Rove said.   What else could he say?    Republicans started and pushed this rumor and the tea party adopted it as a cause.   Republican Presidential candidates talked up the birther issue and republican
audiences ate it up like raw meat fed to hungry lions.   Now that the insanity of the birther debate is hurting the republican party they want to blame it on someone else and desert their masterpiece of lies and spin.   Now Rove calls it a White House Trap.   The utter stupidity of the GOP cannot be defended so once again they
rewrite history and lie about their past.


The poll, Rove said, "fits into the White House theme-line" of vilifying Republicans. "These guys may be lousy at governing," he said, "but they're damn good at politics."

Karl and GW in the Coke Days

Rove compared the birther movement to the John Birch Society, the group that William F. Buckley and other mainstream conservatives shunned in the 1960's for its far-right views.  The group's founder Robert Welch, for instance, called President Dwight D. Eisenhower a "conscious, dedicated agent of the communist conspiracy."   
Since the 1960's the conservative republicans have been lying dim witts and no less than Karl Rove says so.


Rove said that today's Republican leaders should say, "we've got better things to talk about," and then the issue will go away.    This is ignorant on too many fronts to take on so I'll mention just a few.   First when over 50% of your party is spreading this garbage it will not go away simply ecause you stop talking about it.   Second what else do republicans have to talk about?    Their War on Women's Health Care, Their attempt to keep thousands of poor and minority citizens from voting, Their desire to end Medicare, Their desire to restructure and end as we know it Social Security, Tax Breaks for big business and the Rich, Their desire to take away Worker's Rights and end bargaining for wages and benefits.   No more, please, don't tell me any more about republicans.   How completely removed from reality must a voter be to pull the lever for a republican?

If I Had a Job I Would Have Quit by Now

In a few recent instances, Republican leaders have refused to say categorically they believe Mr. Obama was born in the United States.   Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, for instance, said on ABC's "Good Morning America"  that she thought the president should be taken "at his word" about his status as a U.S. citizen, but she stopped short of saying that she believed he was one.

3 Wise Men of GOP - See No - Hear No - Speak No

When asked about the issue, House Speaker John Boehner said the state of Hawaii's declaration that Mr. Obama was born there was "good enough for me."   However, he said with respect to the birthers in Congress, "It's not up to me to tell them what to think."

Bob Vaginal Probe McDonnell hopes to be Mitt's VP

The White House has in the past criticized Republicans for appealing to the "fringe" of Americans who are skeptical of the president's citizenship.    Now that this group is no longer the "FRINGE" but the majority of dim witted republican voters the White House will have to accept that republicans are a special animal and use really small words in speeches if it wants to impart information to republicans.   I don't think the republicans have hit rock bottom yet.   I see the GOP outdoing itself, doubling down and taking dim to a whole new level of pseudo intellect.    And lastly and sadly I can even imagine them holding office and being elected
as our society goes down the tubes.   It won't take but a few more republican administrations to do to the United States of America what till now no enemy could do.


Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus and the Caterpillar

They are just like Caterpillars, for the most part

If Republicans have a problem with women voters, it's because Democrats have fueled that false narrative, the head of the Republican party said in an interview with Bloomberg Television to air this weekend.

"If the Democrats said we had a war on caterpillars and every mainstream media outlet talked about the fact that Republicans have a war on caterpillars, then we'd have problems with caterpillars," Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said as he talked about the GOP's War On Women.    "It's a fiction."

A Gallup/ USA Today poll conducted in late March shows that President Obama has a 19-point advantage over Mitt Romney among women in swing states.    Democrats typically win more support from women than Republicans, but this gap is notably larger than usual.    Republicans have a reputation of neglecting women and their issues and needs but for some reason it has become a platform of the party now that the tea party and ultra-conservatives have captured control of the GOP.

Democrats argue that gap exists because of the recent focus on issues relating to contraception, abortion
rights and women's health care in general.

"The debate has really brought clarity to the fact that women's health needs are under attack by an
increasingly conservative Republican party,"    New York Democratic Rep. Carolyn Maloney said in March.     "I think it's much worse than I've ever seen before."

Democrats were quick Thursday to jump on Priebus to advance their argument, castigating the RNC chairman for "comparing" women to caterpillars".     Priebus explained that a lot of thought had gone into comparing women to caterpillars.     That at first they considered horney bobos monkey like creatures but passed as the reference might not be easy for republicans to make.     Then Priebus described a phone conversation with Rush Limbaugh in which Rush suggested calling women sluts and prostitutes and asking that the war be filmed and provided to him to watch.     In the end Priebus chose to compare women to caterpillars.

"If you agree that attacks on women's health is too serious to be compared to a 'war on caterpillars' tweet @Reince to tell him how you feel!" Democratic National Committee spokesperson Melanie Roussell tweeted.

The Obama campaign even released a statement arguing that Priebus' remarks show women can't trust Romney.   Romney said that he had never seen a caterpillar but would check with his gardener to see if they were anything like women.   Romney's wife was tugging at his sleeve trying to interrupt his statement but Mitt ignored her.   Can you blame him for ignoring her?   He has already given her two Cadallics.   What else does she want?   Romney's staff insisted he has a mind of his own and further stated that he would start carrying it around with him after he wraps up the primary process.

"Reince Priebus' comparison of Republican attempts to limit women's access to mammograms, cervical cancer screenings, and contraception to a 'war on caterpillars' shows how little regard leading Republicans, including Mitt Romney, have for women's health,"  Deputy Campaign Manager Stephanie Cutter said.   To demonstrate that there was no war on caterpillars Priebus stated that he had no position on mammograms, cervical cancer screenings, and contraception for caterpillars and had no plans to develop one.   Reince went further and said he supported caterpillars having any thing they could pay for even two Cadallics and an elevator system to safely garage the cars with.

Democrats have taken a number of tactical steps to rally women voters.  The Obama campaign at the end of the month is hosting a "National Women's Issues Conference" at which the president will speak.  The White House is also highlighting Mr. Obama's attention to women's issues with a forum on women and the economy.

Republicans argue that the economy is exactly the reason women should favor the GOP.  They've pointed to a Pew Report that found "women represent the only group for whom employment growth has lagged behind population growth in the recovery."    Women now earn 71 cents for each $1 that a man earns.   Priebus thinks if the 71
cent could be lowered to 52 cents more women could get jobs and enjoy employeement.   Mitt Romney agreed.    However if someone were to flip Mitt over and shake him he might come to a different conclusion.


LOCAL NEWS

Amherst Virginia Headlines

Lynchburg Headlines

Monroe Virginia Headlines

Madison Heights Headlines


WORLD NEWS

USA NEWS

WORLD NEWS

POLITICAL


So You Want to Donate Some Money to George Zimmerman

Thinking about skipping the white sheet and bed ware sale at Penny's and using that old robe and hood another year.    George wants your money and lots of it.    There are over 30 sites collecting money in his name and he isn't getting one thin dime from any of them and boy! is he POed.

The man who claims he killed Trayvon Martin in self-defense is soliciting PayPal donations on a website he created to pay his legal and other bills such as living expenses, rent, ect.

George Zimmerman created the site -- therealgeorgezimmerman.com --
on Sunday and is running it, his lawyers confirmed.   Over 30 other money-raising sites have emerged since Zimmerman killed Trayvon in Sanford, Fla., on Feb. 26, but Zimmerman said he  "cannot attest to the validity"  of them and that none of the money they get finds its way to him.

Here's the statement he posted:

I am the real George Zimmerman,

On Sunday February 26th, I was involved in a life altering event which led me to become the subject of intense media coverage.   As a result of the incident and subsequent media coverage, I have been forced to leave my home, my school, my employer, my family and ultimately, my entire life.   This website's sole purpose is to ensure my supporters they are receiving my full attention without any intermediaries.

It has come to my attention that some persons and/or entities have been collecting funds, thinly veiled as my  "Defense Fund"  or "Legal Fund".     I cannot attest to the validity of these other websites as I have not received any funds collected, intended to support my family and I through this trying, tragic time.

I have created a Paypal account solely linked on this website as I would like to provide an avenue to thank my supporters personally and ensure that any funds provided come dirctly to me and are used only for living expenses and legal defense,ect.,in lieu of my forced inability to maintain employment.  

I will also personally, maintain accountability of all funds received.   I reassure you, every donation is appreciated.   I need to buy a new vehicle and am considering face altering sugery plus I have rent to pay on a new secret housing unit and need to pay for legal reps. and public spokesmen to represent me on TV.  

I dare not cut my own grass or shop for groceries and other needed items and must pay others to assist me.   I expect this situation to last for a indefinate period of time and I will need many thousands of dollars to keep my life together.   I will be setting up a system that allows you to make monthly donations that are deducted from your checking account or credit card automatically.  

Eventually I will need to move to another part of the country and buy a house there and restart my life using a different name.     This may take place after spending a stretch in prison but I have secured the services of an experienced attorney who got Casey Anthony off when she was accused of killing her daughter.     With the much appreciated funds you send me I can put this attourney to work for me.


Sincerely,
George Zimmerman

PS: If my book and movie deal come thru later I will consider sending an autographed photo to all my supporters who have donated over a thousand dollars, you betcha!


ACV Democratic News

The Future Belongs to Those Who Vote

Thursday, March 29, 2012

NOTICE OF AMHERST COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS

NOTICE  OF  AMHERST  COUNTY DEMOCRATIC  CAUCUS

The Amherst County Democratic Committee hereby announces that it will hold an assembled caucus beginning at 7:30 PM on Monday, April 23, 2012 at the Amherst County Public Library, 200 River James Shopping Center, Madison Heights, VA for the purpose of electing 10 delegates  and  2 alternates to the  6th Congressional District Democratic Convention (May 19th, Lexington, VA) and the 2012 Virginia Democratic State Convention (June 2nd, Fairfax, VA).

Any person wishing to seek election as a delegate or alternate must file with David Burford, Chair of the Amherst County Democratic Committee, 178 Trents Landing Road, Madison Heights, VA 24572, no later than 5:00 PM, Wednesday, April 18, 2012.     A voluntary administrative fee of $10.00 (which may be waived) will be collected at the time of filing for those wishing to be elected as delegate or alternate, a $5.00 for the 6th Congressional District Convention, and a $10 fee for the 2012 Virginia Democratic State Convention.

There is no charge for those wishing to attend and vote at the caucus.

Doors to the caucus will open at 6:30 PM for check-in.   Any person attending the caucus, before participating in such caucus, shall sign a standardized Caucus Participation Form stating that he or she is a Democrat, does not intend to support any candidate who is opposed to a Democratic nominee in the ensuing general election, believes in the principles of the Democratic Party, and is a registered voter in Amherst County.    

Caucus Participation Forms must be filled out at the caucus prior to participating in the caucus.     At 7:30 PM the doors to the caucus will be closed and no person may complete a form and participate in the caucus after that time, with the exception of those persons in line at 7:30 PM.

If only one person files for each delegate and alternate position, the caucus will be canceled.     In this event the Chair will publicly announce the cancellation, proclaim the individuals properly filed as the duly nominated delegates and alternates, and so advise those individuals.

For further information, contact David Burford, Amherst County Democratic Committee, at 434-384-1731 or by email at dave_burford@verizon.net.

Authorized and paid for by the Amherst County Democratic Committee
PO Box 1411, Amherst, VA  24521


Dear Friends,
 
Calling all Amherst Dems!     Would you like to attend the Congressional District Convention, the State Democratic Convention, or the BIG ONE - the Democratic National Convention?

Well, it all starts right here.     Read the Call to Caucus below and request the Pre-Filing Form by return email to start the ball rolling.

PLEASE forward this message to others who may not be getting email.    If there was ever a time to get involved in an election year, it's now.     No experience necessary, and you can do as much or as little as you like.    The important thing is that we all do something.

LOTS of INFO BELOW - PLEASE READ ON ...

 Monday, April 23rd, 6:30 PM  -  A Caucus will be held to elect delegates and alternates to the 6th Congressional District Democratic Convention AND the State Democratic Convention. Scroll down for details.    This Caucus is also the first step for anyone seeking election to the Democratic National Convention.
 
Any questions about being a Delegate or Alternate, please call or write David Burford - 434-384-1731, 434-841-7420, dave_burford@verizon.net.

Watch for more NEWS & INFORMATION ... Coming Soon ...

2012 Amherst County Call to Caucus
 NOTICE OF AMHERST COUNTY
DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS

The Amherst County Democratic Committee hereby announces that it will hold an assembled caucus beginning at 7:30 PM on Monday, April 23, 2012 at the Amherst County Public Library, 200 River James Shopping Center, Madison Heights, VA for the purpose of electing 10 delegates and 2 alternates to the 6th Congressional District Democratic Convention (May 19th, Lexington, VA) and the 2012 Virginia Democratic State Convention (June 2nd, Fairfax, VA).

Any person wishing to seek election as a delegate or alternate must file with David Burford, Chair of the Amherst County Democratic Committee, 178 Trents Landing Road, Madison Heights, VA 24572, no later than 5:00 PM, Wednesday, April 18, 2012.    A voluntary administrative fee of $10.00 (which may be waived) will be collected at the time of filing for those wishing to be elected as delegate or alternate, a $5.00 for the 6th Congressional District Convention, and a $10 fee for the 2012 Virginia Democratic State Convention.

There is no charge for those wishing to attend and vote at the caucus.

Doors to the caucus will open at 6:30 PM for check-in.    Any person attending the caucus, before participating in such caucus, shall sign a standardized Caucus Participation Form stating that he or she is a Democrat, does not intend to support any candidate who is opposed to a Democratic nominee in the ensuing general election, believes in the principles of the Democratic Party, and is a registered voter in Amherst County.    Caucus Participation Forms must be filled out at the caucus prior to participating in the caucus.

At 7:30 PM the doors to the caucus will be closed and no person may complete a form and participate in the caucus after that time, with the exception of those persons in line at 7:30 PM.

If only one person files for each delegate and alternate position, the caucus will be canceled.     In this event the Chair will publicly announce the cancellation, proclaim the individuals properly filed as the duly nominated delegates and alternates, and so advise those individuals.

For further information, contact David Burford, Amherst County Democratic Committee, at 434-384-1731 or by email at dave_burford@verizon.net.
COUNTY  NEWS


Amherst Virginia Headlines


Republicans Have Nothing to Say

Republicans are desperate.     They can’t attack Obama on jobs because the jobs picture is improving.

Their attack on the Administration’s rule requiring insurers to cover contraception has backfired, raising hackles even among many Republican women.

Their attack on Obama for raising gas prices has elicited scorn from economists of all persuasions who know oil prices are set in global markets and that demand in the United States has actually fallen.

Their presidential ambitions are being trampled in a furious fraternal war among Republican candidates.


Their Tea Party wing wants to reopen the budget deal forged with Democrats after Republicans got bloodied by threatening to block an increase in the debt limit.

So what are Republicans to do now?     What they always do when they have nothing else to say.

Call for a tax cut, of course.


It doesn’t matter that their new   “tax reform”   plan (leaked to the Wall Street Journal late Monday, to be released Tuesday morning) has as much chance of being enacted as Herman Cain has of being elected president.

It doesn’t matter than the plan doesn’t detail how they plan to pay for the tax cuts.     Or whether an even bigger whack would have to be taken out of Medicare than Paul Ryan’s original voucher plan – which would drowned many elderly under rising medical costs.

It doesn’t even matter that the plan would probably raise taxes on many lower-income Americans,    All that matters is the headlines.

“House Republican Budget to Propose Lower Income Tax Rates,” says Bloomberg Businessweek.     “Republican Budget Plan Seeks to Play Up Tax Reform,”    says Reuters.     “GOP’s Budget Targets Taxes,”   blares the Wall Street Journal.

Presto.    Republicans have gotten what they wanted on the basis of saying absolutely nothing.



Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley.    He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton.    He has written thirteen books, including The Work of Nations, Locked in the Cabinet, Supercapitalism, and his most recent book, Aftershock.   

His  "Marketplace"  commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.    He is also Common Cause's board chairman.


HEADLINES 

USA NEWS

WORLD NEWS

POLITICAL


Mitt Not Smart Enough To Quit and Go Home

Mitt Romney has been running for president for six years – and he still can't seal the deal.

After losing the Republican nomination to John McCain in 2008, Romney became the presumptive nominee this time around.


The problem is, no one told the rank-and-file Republicans.

Rick shot to the top of the GOP Mountain for about 5 days till his memory failed him at a debate and he disappeared.

Herman recently learned that harrass is one word and that it does not refer to the posterior portion of the human body.     Imagine how much money it would have saved him to learn that earlier.

And instead of a coronation for Romney,  Republican voters have spent the past year holding tryouts for candidates to fill the anyone-but-Romney slot.

They’ve gone from Rick Perry to Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain, Newt Gingrich and now Rick Santorum.     And if Santorum's sweep this week didn't shake Romney up, it should have. 


Compared with Romney, Santorum has little money or organization. But conservative voters like him.

For many, the bottom line is that Romney just hasn't been able to connect.     He is seen as out of touch, too scripted and even aloof.


Think about the infamous $10,000 bet he offered during one debate or his comment that he's not that worried about the very poor. 

Think about how he likes to fire people and his wife's two caddies and the elevator in his new home for his vehicles and how the trees are just the right heigth or the piddling little amount he made giving speeches ($347,000).     This man is ill equipped to relate to normal working people.

Furthermore, it's not really clear what Romney's message is, other than attacking President Obama.     As Howard Kurtz writes in the Daily Beast, Romney  "lacks an animating idea that would bring voters to their feet."

Romney is still the likely Republican nominee.    However, with low voter turnout and a lack of enthusiasm among Republicans, there are signs that he might not fare that well against Obama.

Mitt is Obsessed with being President.     Mitt has thrown awy over 50 million dollars of his own money chasing the position and several times that of rich supporters money.     Voters just aren't that fond of Mitt and it is well known that he will say anything to pander to an audience.

THE MITT ROMNEY CRISIS transcends the seven straight national polls showing Rick Santorum in the lead.    It goes
beyond the embarrassing reality that the son of an auto executive and two-term governor has been behind in every Michigan poll conducted since Groundhog’s Day.     Even more devastating for Romney is that elite Republicans have begun to conclude that he cannot, if nominated, beat Barack Obama.     About the only argument that still works for Romney among GOP insiders is that he would be less of a drag on the ticket than the strident Santorum
or the mercurial Newt Gingrich.

Newt owned the red neck, right wing, cracker, bigot vote lock stock and barrell.     This voting block is also known as the republican base.

With the exception of Mike Dukakis (what is it about governors of Massachusetts?),  it is impossible to recall a top-tier presidential contender who aroused such little passion among the voters. Perhaps Bob Dole in 1996—but if the Bobster didn't inspire awe in Republican voters, he could at least count on their respect.

Compared to Dole's status as a former vice-presidential nominee, Senate leader, and war hero, Romney's boasts about the 2002 Winter Olympics and his single term as governor suffer from transparent grade inflation.

Of course, other major presidential contenders have faced the political abyss and managed to rebound to win the nomination.   But no one has ever quite faced Romney’s particular double whammy of problems:  that he's not very well liked by voters while

NOT Mitt's Dog Seamus

simultaneously being considered ideologically suspect by party activists.    Romney can find plenty of precedents in recent presidential history, but none of them will provide much solace.

Bill Clinton (1992). Roughly one million male babies were born in America between August 1946 and March 1947.    Among them, it is hard to imagine two that had less in common (other than high IQ’s) than Romney and Clinton.     In 1992, facing furors over both Gennifer Flowers and his Vietnam draft record, Clinton begged New Hampshire voters for a second chance telling them,   “I’ll be with you until the last dog dies.”     If Romney tried to turn on 

the charisma in an effort to morph into the Comeback Kid, it would come out as something wooden like:    “Well, gosh. I will be with you using the job-creation skills that I learned in the private sector until we get Seamus off the car roof.” 

I could not believe the lies GW Bush told about me.    GW and Karl are both scum.

George W. Bush (2000).     After John McCain won the New Hampshire primary in a 19-point landslide,  Bush was in danger of losing not only his aura of inevitability but also the nomination itself.    McCain had a potent issue (campaign reform) while Bush had his family pedigree and bromides about   “compassionate conservatism.”    With Bush facing potential defeat in the South Carolina primary, Karen Hughes pulled off one of the most brazen acts of political repackaging in recent history.    At a South Carolina rally, Bush was suddenly proclaimed as the  "Reformer With Results"   even though he had displayed scant interest in campaign reform as Texas governor.    This adroit blurring of McCain’s message played a major role in the Bush bounce back.

Romney might admire the cynicism of the Bush gambit, but the man from Bain Capital has already gone through more costume changes than the Royal Shakespeare Company.     Each time Romney claims to be something he isn’t, he excavates deeper into his personal credibility gap.     At CPAC earlier this month, he boldly tried to recast his moderate record as Massachusetts’ governor as a bit to the right of Calvin Coolidge.     But Romney was not satisfied with his speech text claiming to have been a “conservative governor.”     So, with his unerring instinct for insincere bombast, Romney ad-libbed that he was a “severely conservative governor.”

The solution to many problems of political authenticity is for the candidate to abandon the dictates of his handlers and just go with his instincts.     The problem for Romney is that the doctrine of  “Let Mitt Be Mitt”   would probably produce a candidate with the warmth of a business consultant and the inner conviction of a market-based algorithm.     In short, hiding behind that Mitt Romney mask is (yikes) another Mitt Romney mask.

John Kerry (2004). Unable to compete with Howard Dean’s antiwar fervor and John Edwards’ ersatz populism, Kerry was flailing in the weeks before the Iowa caucuses.     Despite rivaling Romney with his frosty demeanor  (what is it about Massachusetts?),   Kerry prevailed by convincing Democrats that his war record offered the party a formula for victory in November.     After his back-to-back victories in Iowa and New Hampshire, the Massachusetts senator romped to the nomination as a rare modern candidate whose calling card was his purported electability.

Kerry boasted an advantage in the 2004 race that Romney lacks—a 20-year record of ideological consistency.     Like all of his rivals except for Dean, Kerry erred in initially voting for the Iraq War.     But Kerry, who made his initial reputation as a soldier turned Vietnam critic, never had any major problems convincing party activists that he was a liberal who had made an isolated mistake.

Romney, in contrast, went into this campaign offering Republican activists little more than the promise that he would be the strongest candidate against Obama.     But as Romney’s scorched-earth campaign tactics drive down his general-election poll numbers and his campaign-trail awkwardness jeopardizes his argument for electability, he is left without a rationale for his candidacy.     If Republicans don’t feel good about Romney and don’t think he will win in November, then why would they vote for him in the primaries?

The brutal truth is that there are some business-school problems that are as hard to solve as Fermat’s Last Theorem.     A new marketing campaign or a clever slogan cannot save a dog food that the dogs don’t like.     So too is it with the Romney campaign.    At this point, his only hope is to prevail by using about the oldest argument in politics:    “The other guys are worse.”     And considering the caliber of his opponents (the Three Horsemen of the Republican Apocalypse), Mitt Romney may just get away with it in the primary. But this is not the stuff that promising general election campaigns are made of.

ACV Democratic News
Register and Vote to Create a Better World

Blog Archive